BMW 1 Series Coupe Forum / 1 Series Convertible Forum (1M / tii / 135i / 128i / Coupe / Cabrio / Hatchback) (BMW E82 E88 128i 130i 135i)
 





 

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-13-2014, 03:27 PM   #1
OrangeTea
New Member
4
Rep
28
Posts

Drives: 135is
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Michelin Pilot Super Sport or Continental ExtremeContact DW?

I'm looking to change out the RFT to normal tires. Everyone raves about the Michelin PSS but Tirerack.com's got a good deal going on Continental ExtremeContact DW.

I've had Continental ExtremeContact DWS on my previous car and I loved them. Are Pilot Super Sports really worth the extra money? It's about $300 difference.

I honestly don't really drive my cars that hard so I feel like Super Sports will be over kill.
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 03:35 PM   #2
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

I debated those two, called Tire Rack and talked to Gill for awhile and he ended up convincing me to go with the S04's.

He said the PSS and S04 are extremely close and the S04's are real cheap now too so I went with them. I also have a convertible so when he said the S04 is a bit softer over bumps than the PSS he had me hooked.

I like bridgestone. re01 and re-11's have treated me well previously.
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 03:43 PM   #3
gregthegr8
Admiral of the Fleet
gregthegr8's Avatar
265
Rep
3,552
Posts

Drives: Cars Usually
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeTea View Post
I'm looking to change out the RFT to normal tires. Everyone raves about the Michelin PSS but Tirerack.com's got a good deal going on Continental ExtremeContact DW.

I've had Continental ExtremeContact DWS on my previous car and I loved them. Are Pilot Super Sports really worth the extra money? It's about $300 difference.

I honestly don't really drive my cars that hard so I feel like Super Sports will be over kill.
I had this debate and ultimately went with the PSS, but like you, I don't really push mine so feel like it was probably overkill. So, in retrospect, I think I probably would have been just as well off with the extremecontacts and saved the $300+. I considered the pole positions as well, but they're much heavier and some say are kinda loud, too, though I think their performance might be slightly better than the continentals.

The other thing to consider though are all the extra benefits Michelin gives you under the Michelin Plan, which might be especially useful depending on your plan about a spare. They will tow you for free up to I think 150 miles and a friend of mine who recently hit a pothole and had his PSS bubble up in the rear after 2k miles, michelin just gave him a new tire for free under their warranty.

In the end, you can't go wrong with the PSS, just a matter of $. And as a fellow IS-er on the mean (awful) streets of LA, if I had to do it again, I'd be right on the fence and 50-50 since I don't know if I'm taking advantage of or would even notice any of the improvements between the two tires. Hope that helps...though it may make it worse.
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 03:58 PM   #4
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

I missed earlier that you said you liked the DWS. That tire has an extremely soft sidewall. Both the tires you listed will be considerably stiffer
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 06:20 PM   #5
potxoli
First Lieutenant
138
Rep
353
Posts

Drives: 2016 SO F80
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: boston

iTrader: (2)

the S04 seems very appealing, but if you believe tirerack it has a 4lb+ weight penalty per corner. I just got in on the group buy for Apex wheels which are 4lbs+ lighter than stock. If I go PSS, that is another 4lb+ lighter than the run flats, but the S04 are about the same weight as run flats.

So similar to the OP question, would saving another 4lb+ per corner be noticeable?

I think it might be worth it to go PSS or Conti which have the same weight, but S04 seems to have a big weight disadvantage.

The other thing of course is that $300 buys other mods like blacklines or a front sway bar or a used JB4. Decisions Decisions....

Last edited by potxoli; 03-13-2014 at 06:25 PM..
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 07:39 PM   #6
128GP
First Lieutenant
128GP's Avatar
40
Rep
323
Posts

Drives: AW 328i 6sp RWD M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

lol i'm debating which tires to buy as well. I was thinking S04's too and noticed the weight disadvantage. Don't know what to buy.
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 08:24 PM   #7
ShocknAwe
1Addict
ShocknAwe's Avatar
3233
Rep
7,894
Posts

Drives: E82 Mutt, M57 Truck
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Charleston

iTrader: (22)

Not that it will make it easier but you could look at the Vred Vorti. Same category as the PSS. I just got them and couldn't be happier, hooks well in 1st/2nd around corners, but the sidewall is stiff on these badboys too. So..

I'm just getting them worn in now, Think I'm around 400-450 miles on the set. It should just keep getting better, and it's already damn damn good.
__________________
2010 135i 6MT Jet Black
N54/3 FE82 Mutt | BUILD THREAD | GARAGE SALE
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 08:29 PM   #8
Pyrat 2
Colonel
Pyrat 2's Avatar
United_States
1418
Rep
2,560
Posts

Drives: Rapidly from A to B
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago 'burbs or TN Smokies

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
I have owned both. If you're not driving hard the EC are fine although I still prefer the MPSS. If you plan on going to the track then there is no comparison. I had my ECs literally start shredding apart. Suffice it to say it was not a good day for me when this happened. I know its not a track tire but either is the MPSS and they have held up fine.
Appreciate 0
      03-13-2014, 08:51 PM   #9
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=678512

Here's a good thread on the pros and cons of the S04. They look like a great bang for the buck tire IMO.
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 12:47 AM   #10
OrangeTea
New Member
4
Rep
28
Posts

Drives: 135is
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 135iam View Post
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=678512

Here's a good thread on the pros and cons of the S04. They look like a great bang for the buck tire IMO.
That was a good read. Thanks!
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 12:15 PM   #11
potxoli
First Lieutenant
138
Rep
353
Posts

Drives: 2016 SO F80
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: boston

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrangeTea View Post
That was a good read. Thanks!
It was a good read. I'm now 90% sold on the S04s. It is a $350 difference from PSS
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 02:15 PM   #12
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by potxoli View Post
It was a good read. I'm now 90% sold on the S04s. It is a $350 difference from PSS
glad to share others thoughts. I will gladly share my opinion after I get them installed and use them for awhile.

To me it came down to the cost difference, it didnt quite seem justified to me.


My 265/35/18's are being delivered today, and the 245/35/18's arent supposed to make it till Monday. (Tire Rack shipped from different locations)

I will post up my bathroom scale weight per tire to go against the Tire Rack advertised weight for fun. I can also do my new 18x8.5 and 18x9.5 APEX ARC-8 vs APEX advertised weight to make sure my scale is good. (I'm not saying the tires are lighter than advertised because I am sure they are not, but I'll check it)
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 05:34 PM   #13
CAVU
Captain
CAVU's Avatar
United_States
151
Rep
929
Posts

Drives: '16 F87 M2
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ohio

iTrader: (0)

I immediately removed the OEM runflats and replaced with PSSs. It feels like the tire was made for this car. I hear the S04 is a good tire, so I'm interested in hearing your opinion on the S04s (as well as the bathroom scale weigh-in!).
__________________

F87 '16 M2 ... Mineral Grey, 6MT, Exec, MPE
Gone: E82 '13 135is 475/586 ... Mineral Grey / Oyster, DCT, Premium, Tech, HK, Michelin PSS, BMW Performance Suspension
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 05:43 PM   #14
gregthegr8
Admiral of the Fleet
gregthegr8's Avatar
265
Rep
3,552
Posts

Drives: Cars Usually
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (5)

I'd rather hear about the Continentals since I'd rather get those for my purposes than the pole positions (s-04s) since I would prefer the smoother, quieter ride, which may be the OP's goal, especially on these awful streets. The other problem is the weight readings on the 245s and 265s may not be all that helpful to those of us running stock 215/245s or upsized 225/255s.

From a performance standpoint though, I think the S-04s are better than the contis and ALMOST as good as the PSS, consistently rated by tirerack as a close second. But if someone wants a more comfortable DD tire with a softer ride and doesn't want to shell out PSS money, I think the extreme contact DW tires are a good alternative.

Perhaps we can convince OrangeTea to get the continentals so we have 2 identical 135is's, one with PSS, one with the continentals (or s04s) and drive them on the same LA roads for a good test comparison.
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2014, 05:45 PM   #15
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

So Tire Rack says 29 lbs for the 265/35/18 S04 and my bathroom scale says 29.2 lbs.

Both tires banded together were shipped for 58lbs from UPS so they are right at the Tire Rack advertised weight. (Not that I was expecting anything different)
Appreciate 0
      03-15-2014, 02:23 AM   #16
805beemer
Captain
United_States
23
Rep
647
Posts

Drives: 2008 135i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lompoc, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 135iam View Post
I debated those two, called Tire Rack and talked to Gill for awhile and he ended up convincing me to go with the S04's.

He said the PSS and S04 are extremely close and the S04's are real cheap now too so I went with them. I also have a convertible so when he said the S04 is a bit softer over bumps than the PSS he had me hooked.

I like bridgestone. re01 and re-11's have treated me well previously.
Why didn't you go with the re-11's, that's what I'm leaning towards now. I just got my arc 8s and am still up in the air in regards to which tire to go with.
Appreciate 0
      03-15-2014, 09:29 PM   #17
135iam
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
257
Posts

Drives: 2010 135i 6mt
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: IL

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 805beemer View Post
Why didn't you go with the re-11's, that's what I'm leaning towards now. I just got my arc 8s and am still up in the air in regards to which tire to go with.
I had the RE-11's on a mildly track prepped S2000 that I drove to trackday events and seldom drove otherwise (race seats, harnesses, cooling ducts, rollbar, suspension mods kinda ruined it as a daily driver) I was caught on the interstate in the rain multiple times going to events and the RE-11's half worn and below on Semi grooved interstates that hold water is a white knuckle drive to say the least. So I went with a more streetable tire for the 135 as its staying a primarily a street car.

If I lived in a dry area, I would get the re-11's. They were surprisingly quite for the first 2/3 wear.
Appreciate 0
      03-15-2014, 10:28 PM   #18
805beemer
Captain
United_States
23
Rep
647
Posts

Drives: 2008 135i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lompoc, CA

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 135iam View Post
I had the RE-11's on a mildly track prepped S2000 that I drove to trackday events and seldom drove otherwise (race seats, harnesses, cooling ducts, rollbar, suspension mods kinda ruined it as a daily driver) I was caught on the interstate in the rain multiple times going to events and the RE-11's half worn and below on Semi grooved interstates that hold water is a white knuckle drive to say the least. So I went with a more streetable tire for the 135 as its staying a primarily a street car.

If I lived in a dry area, I would get the re-11's. They were surprisingly quite for the first 2/3 wear.
RE-11's it is! I live in socal so rain won't be an issue, and if it is I'll drive my truck. Thanks!
Appreciate 0
      03-15-2014, 10:38 PM   #19
Dackelone
European Editor
Dackelone's Avatar
Germany
10589
Rep
22,992
Posts

Drives: N54 e82
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bayern, Germany

iTrader: (1)

Hands down the best tire out there is the PSS. You won't see anything but glowing reviews. And the biggest selling point with the Michelins is that they are AWESOME tires not just when brand new,but also a few years down the road. Often times once tires get some miles on them, they will make lots of tire noise and start to pull on "cambered" roads. The Michelins are a very good tire.

G.L. on your tire choice - and please report back to us.
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2014, 08:29 AM   #20
TheSt|G
Resident Tamed Racing Driver
TheSt|G's Avatar
United_States
298
Rep
4,697
Posts

Drives: 911, 130is, E39 M5, E36 M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside Philly

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dackelone View Post
Hands down the best tire out there is the PSS. You won't see anything but glowing reviews. And the biggest selling point with the Michelins is that they are AWESOME tires not just when brand new,but also a few years down the road. Often times once tires get some miles on them, they will make lots of tire noise and start to pull on "cambered" roads. The Michelins are a very good tire.

G.L. on your tire choice - and please report back to us.
Spot on.

Everytime I get a tire that isn't a Michelin, I'm massively disappointed. At this point its not even a thought. From PSS to Primacys to X-Ice, they are really best in class.
__________________
2005 E46 M3 Interlagos/Cinnamon with Sunroof Delete
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2014, 09:43 AM   #21
mb135is
Captain
89
Rep
912
Posts

Drives: '13 135is #180/586
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

I'm debating this right now. The $ savings is really pushing me in the direction of the DW, and I'm one of the biggest PSS supporters there is having run them on my previous car.
__________________

E82 '13 135is - Space Gray/Coral Red, 6 MT,
Heated Seats, 50% tint, clear bra, BMW Perf. Grilles, BMW Perf. CF Diffuser - #180/586
Appreciate 0
      03-16-2014, 12:12 PM   #22
PA135i
Brigadier General
PA135i's Avatar
United_States
968
Rep
3,323
Posts

Drives: 08 135i 08 CR-V
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pennsylvania

iTrader: (0)

I'm due this spring for a new set and these 3 tires are what I was considering. I have owned the Conti DW's and liked them. The price is good for the Conti's for the quality of tire. The S-04's seem to be a good choice also because of price and reviews I have read.

The deal breaker for me is do the Michelins last longer than the others?
If they do, it might be a wash and I'd be going for the Michelin PSS.

Anyone have advice on how the Michelin PSS hold up in mileage?
__________________
Sparkling Graphite Metallic / 6MT / Terracotta Boston Leather / Sport Package / Comfort Access system / Gray Poplar wood trim / Heated front seats / iPod and USB adapter / HD radio / Premium hi-fi system / OE Tuning / VRSF Intercooler & charge pipe / BMW Performance short shift kit / BMW M Performance Handbrake Handle / BMW Stainless steel pedals / V1 hardwired / rear sun shades Pennsylvania 20 electoral votes
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:07 PM.




1addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST