|
|
04-04-2011, 01:11 PM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
If anyone has tried it, there opinion on it,
- ease of application - if need be, how to remove it, - in general, are thee claims far fetched or are they realistic. - does it bead like crazy, I just loves to see the hydrophobic reaction of water on Zymol concours wax
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2011, 03:51 PM | #7 | |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
Quote:
-Mildly easy, needs to properly and thoroughly "dry" prior to buffing off -Remove with Microfiber towels -Still don't know yet -No, but it seems to make the car cleaner longer and cleans easily as things don't stick as easily to the finish. Waxes seem to make the biggest difference in increasing surface tension (which leads to beading). Keep in mind beading /= quality protection. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-07-2011, 01:46 AM | #10 |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
C1 has a much simpler application and seems to have better initial slickness. Can't say much more - we haven't touched the Maserati since we worked on it. I'm hoping to give her a nice check-up to see how she's doing soon though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 12:49 PM | #11 | |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
Quote:
also, would you be able to supply me with C1 as most internet vendors don't carry it.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 01:40 PM | #12 |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
More of it being used on a GTI we recently posted online: http://www.golfmk6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=18392
I can't tell you all too much, but once I wash my test dummy (g/f's '07 Jet Black Saab 9-3) I should be able to tell you what I think so far as it'll be 6-8 months since it was applied. The Maserati Gran Turismo we used C1 on is still unknown as we haven't done any follow up on it at this time. Here's some reading to help you out in the mean-time: http://www.autopia.org/forum/profess...utolavish.html |
Appreciate
0
|
05-04-2011, 03:58 PM | #13 | |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-23-2011, 07:03 PM | #14 | |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 02:40 AM | #15 | |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
Quote:
So I washed my girlfriend's car not long ago to see how the CQuartz was doing, and I've found it to be non-existent. The paint is extremely contaminated (car does live outside, but a constantly protected surface doesn't feel like this 6-7 months later), does not bead water, has no slickness, and is missing gloss. It's still swirl-free as it's only been washed 4 times since being properly prepped and has always been washed correctly by me, but the car feels brutal and I look forward to throwing something - ANYTHING on it soon. She's going to need a thorough wash, clay, light polish, and seal so I have to find the 5ish hours to get it all done. Also take into account it's only been washed with high quality stuff (Dodo Juice Supernatural Shampoo or Born to be Mild Shampoo) and I always dilute shampoos correctly. There's no way it should feel the way it does. Keep in mind my initial review: this coating wasn't applied 100% correctly so that may affect things. Still unsure about the C1: haven't touched the Maserati still. Opti-Coat AKA Opti-Guard is confirmed by us (and others) as being legit and truly durable, but with the hardest application of them all. Because of it's outstanding durability, it's very important to do it right or you'll create permanent streaking that'll need to be polished off. You may want to look into something like the Opti-Coat 2.0 which is made with more / stronger solvents in order to be slower acting for the DIYer. http://www.detailedimage.com/Optimum...-Coating-P554/ Still... careful as this isn't for someone that doesn't have good experience in detailing. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 09:58 AM | #16 |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
thanks for the update, I was leaning towards the C1, the application process seemed better suited to me and also the fact the you said it had a slicker feel to it. Also the fact that I'm impressed with their C5 wheels sealant which has seems to be unaffected by strong degreasers and wheel cleaners, as opposed to a wheels wax.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 04:12 PM | #17 | |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 06:21 PM | #18 |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
do you think using regularly reload on the saab would have helped cquartz last longer? or at least retain some beading and slickness?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 07:38 PM | #19 |
Major General
1997
Rep 6,916
Posts |
you may want to try Aquartz and follow with Aquartz Reload.
we have also had success with Opti Coat followed with Aquartz Reload for that slickness everyone wants. Some cars we have done with Aquartz and Opti Coat Lexus Audi S4 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-01-2011, 10:30 PM | #20 |
Banned
27
Rep 872
Posts |
Potentially yes, but I wanted to truly test the product without interference. Reload does wonders for the application of Opti-Coat IME, but I didn't want to throw in another variable in this specific coating test. If I need a QD to keep up protection, then I'd rather go with a traditional sealant.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2011, 09:45 AM | #21 |
Major General
1997
Rep 6,916
Posts |
so far all the coatings I have used provide little to no beading or slickness.
I have used Nanolex Opti Coat Cquartz However Aquartz does leave a very slick finish. These coatings are ment to provide a more durable finish, protection against the elements but in no way will they be the miracle end all product. Its not going to prevent swirls from happening or scratches. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2011, 11:34 AM | #22 | |
First Lieutenant
40
Rep 318
Posts |
isn't Aquartz the old version of Cquartz?
Quote:
also, is there something from Chemical guys that's like the Reload spray, ie. something that will give the finish slickness and will make it repel water better while being cheaper than reload?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|