BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Track / Autocross / Dragstrip / Driving Techniques
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-27-2017, 11:23 AM   #1
Nihilation
Lieutenant
United_States
184
Rep
518
Posts

Drives: BMW M3, 328xi AT and 328i 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Haymarket, VA

iTrader: (1)

We know the highlights of running a square setup is the ability to rotate tires for more even wear and longevity as well as decreasing understeer. Being that the widest generally accepted front tire is a 275 width, it also helps to keep tire costs down.

That said, my question is for anyone who has gone from a square setup back to staggered: Why? Was it preferred driving dynamics? Ability to get on throttle earlier? Love to hear feedback.

I bought a set of 18x10's and planned on going 275 or maybe 285 sqaure but am debating going with a wider rear setup. Budgeting a set of street tires for a year (realistically 6 months/12 track days), the cost difference of 275 squared to 275/295 staggered seems to be less than $200. So it's not that much more if the benefits are there.

Last edited by Nihilation; 02-27-2017 at 03:47 PM..
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 11:34 AM   #2
TWiTCHY
Colonel
TWiTCHY's Avatar
No_Country
376
Rep
2,526
Posts

Drives: '13 AW E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: WA

iTrader: (6)

Sub'd. Just went square and wondering if there is any reason to keep my staggered setup.
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 12:32 PM   #3
SYT_Shadow
///M Powered for Life
SYT_Shadow's Avatar
11489
Rep
10,329
Posts

Drives: E90M/E92M/M4GTS/M4GT4/X5M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwich, CT

iTrader: (2)

Well, one should try to maximize grip

10.5 square fits pretty well, so you can start with that

If I could run it staggered, I'd run it with an 11 rear... but there isn't an 11 rear right now that is well documented to fit

So, I keep my square setup
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 03:42 PM   #4
roastbeef
Lieutenant General
roastbeef's Avatar
United_States
11586
Rep
12,726
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (4)

I have a set of 315's I got for really cheap with a set of 275 nt01's. I was planning on running them on my square 10.5 wheels the next time i went to the streets of willow. Just to screw around, mostly. Not sure if I'll like it or not, but it's a tighter course and I wanted to see if it helps with more push out of the turns.
__________________
Instagram; @roastbeefmike
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 04:40 PM   #5
okusa
Lieutenant Colonel
okusa's Avatar
No_Country
846
Rep
1,679
Posts

Drives: 2011.75 E90 M3 - SSII
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (7)

I run 295 square and the only reason for me to go staggered is if I go full race slicks and try and fit something larger in the rear. However, that would require rolling the fenders and cutting some crap out of the way.
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 08:58 PM   #6
theautoculture
New Member
5
Rep
29
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW M3 (E92)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (1)

MasterP is 18x11 Square
Appreciate 0
      02-27-2017, 08:59 PM   #7
theautoculture
New Member
5
Rep
29
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW M3 (E92)
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (1)

But I'd like to know as well.
18x10 275/35 Square
18x10.5 285/35 Square
OR 18x10 and 18x11 275/35 and 295/35

With any suspension and camber adjustments too
Appreciate 0
      02-28-2017, 09:43 AM   #8
SYT_Shadow
///M Powered for Life
SYT_Shadow's Avatar
11489
Rep
10,329
Posts

Drives: E90M/E92M/M4GTS/M4GT4/X5M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwich, CT

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by theautoculture View Post
MasterP is 18x11 Square
then he needs to come and give us his specs!
Appreciate 0
      03-02-2017, 03:07 PM   #9
MasterP
Colonel
721
Rep
2,342
Posts

Drives: All the M's
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Where do you want me?

iTrader: (8)

18x11 et 25, 305/645-18 Square.

AST5200 GS Doubles. Swift 16KF, 18KR

Camber is -3.8F, Rear is -2.4. Zero Toe F&R

18mm spacer in front to clear the lower spring perch.

10mm spacer in rear to make up the difference in front track gain.

This setup has great turn in and overall grip. Car is not pushy unless I'm overdriving it and it rotates under power without any instability.

I've done 275/295 staggered, 285 square on 18X10 square, 285/295, 295 Square, 295/315 and putting 305's in front on the 18X11 has been the secret sauce.

I never see myself going back to a staggered setup.
Appreciate 3
roastbeef11586.00
SYT_Shadow11488.50
tsk941522.00
      04-28-2018, 11:13 AM   #10
cheezlehp4e92
Enlisted Member
18
Rep
44
Posts

Drives: 10 E92 M3 DCT & 15 F82 M4 6spd
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by okusa View Post
I run 295 square and the only reason for me to go staggered is if I go full race slicks and try and fit something larger in the rear. However, that would require rolling the fenders and cutting some crap out of the way.
Hey, sorry to revive an old-ass thread, but I'm considering some tires that only come 265/35 or 295/30/18.

Wondering what your wheel and camber specs were while running 295 square, and if you had any issues?

I'm on 18x10.5 apex wheels with -3.2 camber up front.
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2018, 06:43 PM   #11
okusa
Lieutenant Colonel
okusa's Avatar
No_Country
846
Rep
1,679
Posts

Drives: 2011.75 E90 M3 - SSII
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheezlehp4e92 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by okusa View Post
I run 295 square and the only reason for me to go staggered is if I go full race slicks and try and fit something larger in the rear. However, that would require rolling the fenders and cutting some crap out of the way.
Hey, sorry to revive an old-ass thread, but I'm considering some tires that only come 265/35 or 295/30/18.

Wondering what your wheel and camber specs were while running 295 square, and if you had any issues?

I'm on 18x10.5 apex wheels with -3.2 camber up front.
I run 10.5 square and max out my front camber (-3.9). My front wheel well liners got progressively chewed over time so I just ripped them out a while ago. No other issues.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2018, 10:23 AM   #12
dparm
Stop the hate, get a V8
dparm's Avatar
United_States
3850
Rep
8,625
Posts

Drives: C7 Corvette GS, AMG C63 S
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Frisco, TX

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nihilation View Post
We know the highlights of running a square setup is the ability to rotate tires for more even wear and longevity as well as decreasing understeer. Being that the widest generally accepted front tire is a 275 width, it also helps to keep tire costs down.

That said, my question is for anyone who has gone from a square setup back to staggered: Why? Was it preferred driving dynamics? Ability to get on throttle earlier? Love to hear feedback.

I bought a set of 18x10's and planned on going 275 or maybe 285 sqaure but am debating going with a wider rear setup. Budgeting a set of street tires for a year (realistically 6 months/12 track days), the cost difference of 275 squared to 275/295 staggered seems to be less than $200. So it's not that much more if the benefits are there.

I think it's hard to definitively say that one setup is optimal for every car/track/driver.

What mods does your car have? What's your driving style?
__________________
Now: 2017 Corvette Grand Sport, 2021 AMG C63 S sedan
Past: 2011.5 M3 sedan ZCP
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST