|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
17" v 18" Wheels ?
|
|
05-11-2011, 03:28 PM | #2 |
That guy
117
Rep 5,740
Posts
Drives: 2015 Cayman GTS
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago Burbs
|
difference between 17 to 18s is about a tenth, imo, of the difference between 18s and 19s. You likely can't tell the difference unless you compared them back to back.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2011, 11:14 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
8
Rep 150
Posts |
My wife has 18s on her Civic and you can feel every bump in the car compared to my bm which has 17in runflats. You still feel them but not as much and it put me off getting a set of 18s for summer and keeping the 17s for winter rubber.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2011, 12:33 PM | #4 |
THE DIESEL WEASEL
26
Rep 304
Posts
Drives: BMW 330e
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
|
the e92 m3 18" wheels I got were lighter and more smoother ride than my std 17's so depends if you get the right one mate, also if you switch from runflat to non makes a difference too.
__________________
THE TURK....
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2011, 01:59 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant
32
Rep 549
Posts |
I'd also add that my E90 on 18's feels better* than my old E92 on 18's.
Both M Sport, both on RFT..... Go figure. *thats for 'comfort' and the handling doesn't seem to suffer, but I'm no Stig
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2011, 02:24 PM | #6 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
TBH there's no firm conclusion. Some prefer 17s, some prefer 18s. Try both if you can and decide for yourself! I prefer 17s but I am a bit of an oddity on E90post...
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2011, 02:48 PM | #7 |
Major
243
Rep 1,205
Posts |
I have found the 19" wheels on my 2010 e92 330d far more comfortable than the 18" ones on my 2008 e92 320d ..... its not just the wheels and tyres but the whole way the suspension is set up ....
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 05:12 AM | #9 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
And that is what makes it difficult to say how a particular car will ride, on a given wheel size. Generally though, a 17" will ride better than a 18", with the same suspension and same tyre brand/spec. Even within a size, different tyres will change the ride quality. Changing to a winter tyre can show this, as typically the same size winter tyre is more comfortable. Remember each tyre has a spring rate, (well actually as we drive, an ever changing spring rate) so it is part of the total suspension spring rate. One factor which influences comfort, is whether the resulting suspension frequencies and harmonics enhance or detract from the ride quality. Don't forget tyre and rim weight are critical as well, to what feels best, as unsprung weight is a key factor in ride comfort. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 02:01 PM | #11 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-13-2011, 02:15 PM | #12 |
Second Lieutenant
16
Rep 280
Posts |
When I switched from 18's to 17's (originally for winter tyres) the difference was such that sold the 18's and moved to 17's for the summers as well.
In my case this also involved moving from 255 rears to 225 all round, a valid option in my case without upsetting the insurance company since it is an SE not an MSport, and 225/45/17 all round is an option on the plate for summer and winter use. The improvements were:
Of course the narrower rears should be less prone to aquaplaning in the wet as well, which is IMHO the time a tyre's performance is most critical for road use. Well worth it for me, but I appreciate the looks are more important than the dynamic benefits for some people - if I lived in a city, drove a coupe not a touring, and did a lot fewer miles then I might have kept the 18's! |
Appreciate
0
|
05-18-2011, 05:28 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant
56
Rep 540
Posts |
E91 330d LCI Msport.
I have 2 sets of staggered wheels with RFT tyres: F 225/40/R18 88Y, 8J, ET34 R 255/35/R18 90Y, 8.5J, ET37 Michelin Pilot sport and F 225/45 17/8J/ET34 R 255/40 17/8.5J/ET37 Bridgestone Potenza The 17" are much more comfortable; absorbing alot more bump & vibration from the road surface, The 18" setup is more precise in hard cornering (DTC or less driving style), but the difference here is not noticeable when driving gently. None of this is surprising really. But oddly I find the 17" setup has alot more tramlining - maybe due to different tyre makes. I intend to replace the RFTs with non-RFT summer & winter tyres.
__________________
Jules
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2011, 04:45 PM | #14 |
Private
10
Rep 87
Posts |
I recently fitted 18 inch ellipsoids after having 17's with non rfts'. As Pete states the 18s are heavier and increasing the unsprung weight gives the dampers a much harder time to control the wheels and tyre on rougher roads. My SE with 70 k on the clock suddenly felt like it had gone from a pair of Nike Air to a pair of Dunlop wellies. I the fitted Eibach Pro Kit Progressive Springs and Bilstein B6 Dampers and then it felt like the suspension was back in control. FYI the Fronts are running Bridgestone RFT RE50's and rears are on Bridgestone RE40 non RFT's. I despise the runflats but having blown al my savings fitting new bathroom means that the RFT's will be on for a bit longer. Without the RFT's up front I predict that my ride and comfort will be an acceptably compliant but sufficiently feedback compromise. I will be fitting the 17's once the salt goes down and wil be interested to see whether the cars handling dynamics improve - I sneakily suspect it will over a greater range of surfaces and conditions as I have laways thought the SE/LX variants of cars have always been more capable over a broader range of surfaces and conditions than the more focussed Sport variants. Will rport at the back end of the year
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|