|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
RFT Replacement
|
|
03-22-2011, 05:13 AM | #1 |
Detailing
13
Rep 440
Posts |
RFT Replacement
The rears on my car will be due for replacement in a few thousand miles time - and I'm probably going to change to non RFT -
What I need to know is, as my fronts still have plenty of life left in them can I run a split set up ie RFT's on the front and non RFT's on the rear? I don't really want to bin the fronts ideally! |
03-22-2011, 05:26 AM | #2 |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 482
Posts |
no, you can not mix rft with non rft, car will be dangerous to drive! take the fronts off and flog them on ebay, you can use the money and put it towards paying for the non rft's
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2011, 05:39 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant General
1867
Rep 13,043
Posts
Drives: BMW M340I G20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
|
Keep the fronts and rears if they are legal, store them somewhere, when you go to trade it back in, dealers like runflats to be fitted. Otherwise they might try and knock you £1200 on the price.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2011, 05:48 AM | #4 |
Banned
175
Rep 4,302
Posts
Drives: M135i
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South West
|
Changed all mine when the fronts still had a fair bit of tread. I just got the fitter to take them away, such was my hatred for them!
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2011, 06:13 AM | #5 |
Major General
1545
Rep 8,970
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2011, 03:50 PM | #7 |
Private
10
Rep 87
Posts |
I ran 225 17 continental RFT's on the rears and Bridgestone Potenzas on the fronts for about 2000 miles - might not be factory recommended but to be honest no real ill effects unless your rear track is out but that would happen with non rfts all round. I got four non RFT's now and the car does feel much more natural.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2011, 04:35 PM | #8 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 171
Posts |
For nearly a year have had RFT on rear and non RFT on fronts. No handling problems, better than when all RFT as dangerous tramlining now gone.
I do drive the car hard too. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2011, 04:47 PM | #9 | |
LSD - No, you're not seeing things
72
Rep 3,302
Posts |
Quote:
Then you can do WTF you like
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-24-2011, 07:03 PM | #10 | |
First Lieutenant
25
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
At the risk of sounding extremely stupid. ....Why would it be dangerous? i thought the only difference between the tyre options is a reinforced steel wall? Is it incase you blow more than one tyre at once? Tony |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2011, 10:44 AM | #12 | |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 482
Posts |
Quote:
the car wont respond as you would expect it to when turning etc, hence making it dangerous. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2011, 11:24 AM | #13 |
Brigadier General
112
Rep 4,021
Posts |
When I first test drove my car it had new non run flat on the front. They were replaced with run flats before sale.
The front end did seem smoother and you could feel the front was a little softer too, but still the similar grip levels and equally predictable. In no way did I feel the car felt unstable though. I can't see to much flex coming through 30/35 series 19 inch tyres. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2011, 04:38 PM | #14 |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 42
Posts |
My fronts are coming to the end of their life, i am getting rid of the run flats and looking at a full set of either Falken 452's or Toyo Proxes T1's any recommendations.
Thanks |
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2011, 05:11 PM | #15 |
Zummerzet Zyder Drinker!
112
Rep 5,541
Posts
Drives: '06 330D Le Mans Blue
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Somerset
|
From my POV it's not reccomended but I wouldn't have any reservations in running RFT's with non RFT's - obviously same type of tyre across each axle though.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 12:20 AM | #16 |
Lieutenant
33
Rep 445
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 02:32 AM | #17 |
Squadron Leader (Ret'd)
25
Rep 627
Posts |
You may not think it has improved - but if you had an accident and 'handling' was an issue, you can be sure that your insurance company and the police may see it differently. Your choice and your risk.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2011, 08:52 AM | #18 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 171
Posts |
Quote:
On previous cars i've noticed a bigger differnce when have say new rears (as replaced old ones) and part worn fronts. Lot of mis-information on these forums from people who've never mixed but seem certain it's dangerous. I've done it in the real world for a year, it's perfectly safe, RFT and non RFT are NOT fundamentally different tyres like say cross-ply & radials usto be. They just have a stiffer side wall. Anyway just my opinion, each to their own. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2011, 01:27 PM | #19 |
Private First Class
2
Rep 154
Posts
Drives: 2006 e90
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Stoke-On-Trent
|
Guys i've worked for Michelin for 22 years and as far as run flats are concerned Michelin are far superior, anything else is false econonmy,they will last loads longer,grip better,all round safer tyre,even better in the snow(with a 3x2 slab in the boot) And if you have any problems with the tyre michelin will come out to you and replace free of charge(if it's a manufacturing fault) Oh and it's bad practice to mix RFT and non RFT. Like mixing radial with the old cross thread, it is legal as long as you have the legal depth,just not a good idea..Hope this helps...Btw i get my tyres for free :-)
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-09-2011, 02:00 PM | #20 |
Major General
268
Rep 9,915
Posts
Drives: VW T5
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Worcestershire
|
Can I be your special friend?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|