|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
70 mph 5th or 6th ?
|
|
07-23-2005, 05:55 AM | #1 |
Photographer
41
Rep 313
Posts |
70 mph 5th or 6th ?
I have put about 80 miles from last night, mostly highway mileage. I have noticed how 5th gear yields better mileage on mpg display at 70 mph. What is the recommended minimum speed for 6th gear? Is it in manual? I haven't had the time read the manual yet. Some cars have recommended minimum speed for certain gears, does e90 have that inforamtion? First time BMW owner so help me out guys.
|
07-23-2005, 06:01 AM | #2 |
Private
4
Rep 51
Posts |
Which engine and gearbox do you have?
What is the corresponding RPM for 70mph in 5th and 6th gear?
__________________
____________________________________
330i SE Ti silver, sports steering wheel, heated sports seats, black dakota, lumbar support, adaptive headlights, 162 wheels, bluetooth phone prep, Hi-Fi stereo, folding mirrors. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 07:28 AM | #3 |
Captain
102
Rep 614
Posts |
I can't see how you're getting better mileage using 5th vs. 6th gear @ 70mph regardless of what gearbox you have. Are you using the OBC to calculate your MPG or eyeballing the MPG gauge?
The manual makes no mention of minmal speed for specific gears...With these new gearboxes, you can pretty much go from 30 to 150mph in 6th gear. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 08:55 AM | #4 |
Photographer
41
Rep 313
Posts |
Well, that is why I posted this theread. I drove about 5 miles @ 70 mph in 5th gear and the display stayed steady at 25.8 mpg and then drove about 5 miles @ 70 mph in 6th gear and showed 24.5 mpg. I have manual by the way. Is it possible that 6th gear does not have enough power @70 mph? and that causing less mileage? I am wondering my self.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 09:05 AM | #5 |
First Lieutenant
30
Rep 327
Posts |
At low revs, an engine can be running less efficiently, since it does not purge the previous cycle's waste products from the combustion chambers as well as when the flow is increased a little and this faster flow can drag the next fuel/air charge in more effectively.
Also, the fuel efficiency you measure will be very much affected by how consistent the flatness of the road is, and any head/tail wind. There are a few variables at work here, but it sounds to me as though you may be onto something, even if it's a small effect.
__________________
1998 323is SP manual with all the goodies in ArktisSilber + 330i auto SP PP CW iDrive/Nav SatRadio Active Steering Arktis/Beige/Poplar |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 09:11 AM | #6 | |
Lieutenant General
419
Rep 12,276
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 09:22 AM | #7 |
Addict
203
Rep 2,074
Posts |
I would drive in 5. Don't shift unnessasarily! I only go into sixth at about 130-140 km/h. My diesel doesn't like to be in 4th at 60km's/hm - learn to feel your car...treat her like a lady
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 09:47 AM | #8 | |
Photographer
41
Rep 313
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2005, 11:24 PM | #11 |
Major General
155
Rep 6,158
Posts |
I don't see why you wouldn't be in top gear for highway cruising
why rev your engine higher than you have to. If you're spinning the engine faster you're injecting fuel more often you'll get better gas mileage in 6th, they gave you that extra gear for a reason so use it! |
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2005, 01:48 AM | #13 | |
Private First Class
8
Rep 121
Posts |
Quote:
So, for a given speed, the most efficient gear is the one that puts your RPMs closest to the torque peak for that particular car. The E90 330 hits it's torque peak at 2750 RPM, and drops quickly below that level, so if 6th gear puts you below that RPM, 5th gear (or lower) is your best bet for economy. Unfortunately, my 330 is still a couple of weeks away, so someone else will have to answer the original poster's question... ie, what RPMs do 5th & 6th run at 70 mph? MC |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2005, 03:32 AM | #14 | |
Private
37
Rep 69
Posts |
Quote:
If you were to plot fuel consumption rate of an engine (fuel consumption/time), there are two main variables - 1. rotational rate (RPM) and 2. torque. The torque is NOT the maximum rated torque but the torque load on the engine. So the fuel consumption rate would be a 2-D surface rather than a line. Now to compute the fuel efficiency of the car, you would need: miles / gallon = speed (miles/time) / fuel consumption rate (gallons/time) So the best way to maximize fuel efficiency is to drive as fast as possible with minimum fuel consumption rate - totally obvious. So how do you maximize speed? Well, you either go to higher gear (hence for each turn of the engine, you travel farther) or speed up the engine (turn the engine faster). How do you minimize fuel consumption? Well, the simple answer is to turn the engine slower. Hence to maximize fuel efficiency at a given speed, you want to be at the highest gear and lowest engine speed. What is the lowest engine speed? It is the engine rotational speed at which it has sufficient torque to maintain constant vehicle speed! (since vehicle speed and torque required to maintain constant speed are inter-related or function of each other). Therefore, as a rule-of-thumb, it is most fuel efficient to be in the highest possible gear for a given speed. The reason why you don't drive in 6th gear at 5 mph is that the engine may not produce enough torque at that engine rotational speed (and is therefore lugging or stalling) AND you want acceptable acceleration (as acceleration in 6th gear at 5 mph will be terrible since it does not generate much MAXIMUM torque at that rotational speed). MC68386 almost had it right. Cars have best fuel economy at the MAXIMUM torque at a GIVEN engine rotational speed to maintain constant speed, NOT the ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM torque on the torque curve. There are some complications though. As I said before, the fuel consumption rate of an engine varies with BOTH speed and torque. The fuel consumption rate might not be monotonically increasing with both speed and torque. Sometimes, there might be some kinks due to the specific engine design. So the kinks (non-monotonic increase in fuel consumption rate versus engine speed and torque) can cause anomalies such as car being more efficient at a lower gear (say 5th versus 6th at 55 mph). However, this is rather rare, and I suspect that if egtlover74 re-did his experiment with care, 6th gear will indeed be more efficient at 70 mph. There will be other factors, too, such as if you are looking for the speed at which the car will be most fuel efficient. However, this will lead to a long discussion about shapes of 2-D surfaces and optimization theories, so I'll just stop here. Last edited by e90wraith; 07-24-2005 at 11:14 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-25-2005, 05:56 AM | #17 |
Photographer
41
Rep 313
Posts |
Allright, I finally tested 5th and 6th gear @60,70 and 80 mgh. 70 and 80 mph clearly yields better mileage with 6th gear. However 60 mph still needs to be tested little more. It sees to be lack of power at or below 60 mph when in 6th gear. So I have decided that any speed above 60 is good for 6th gear. MPG display also seems to count the time since the engine start. Bottom line is stick to 6th gear when speed is above 60 mph.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 10:51 AM | #18 |
Captain
36
Rep 798
Posts |
When I'm looking at my "real time" MPG meter, comparing gearing it doesn't always seem to be valid. It also seems that the real time MPG meter is optimistic as compared to my actual MPG as measured the old fashion way. I realize that part of the discrepancy is that at the pump, I have to include more city mileage, but somehow it still seems off.
How much faith do other's place in the real-time MPG meter? |
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 02:35 PM | #19 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
45
Rep 1,738
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2006 325i - Sparkling Graphite
2000 S2000 - New Formula Red 2007 Chev Silverado crew cab Z71 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 02:36 PM | #20 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
45
Rep 1,738
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2006 325i - Sparkling Graphite
2000 S2000 - New Formula Red 2007 Chev Silverado crew cab Z71 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2007, 05:43 PM | #21 |
Lieutenant
149
Rep 481
Posts
Drives: 2007 335 e90 1998 e39 540
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oceanside, New York
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2023 BMW i4 m50 [0.00]
2020 BMW M340 [0.00] 2018 mx3 40 [0.00] 2016 340 [0.00] 2013 BMW ACYIVE HYB ... [0.00] 2010 BMW X535D [0.00] |
No one mentioned load. If the car is going on a slight uphill grade the load will be higher. You will use more gas at a constant speed in the same or higher gear if the load is higher. If the load is the same (ie grade of the road, wind, # of passengers in the car) mpg in a higher gear has to be better. At least thats my understanding.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-07-2007, 05:34 AM | #22 | |
Major General
275
Rep 9,218
Posts |
Quote:
Since no roads in the UK are entirely flat at a steady 70mph, if I had cruise engaged my 330i would probably do better in 5th. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|