proTUNING Freaks
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BMW M3 and BMW M4 Forum > BMW F80 M3 / F82 M4 Forum > BMW M4 GTS Discussions

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-13-2016, 05:38 PM   #1
Law
Global Moderator
Law's Avatar
United_States
6377
Rep
2,309
Posts

Drives: E90 M3 6MT
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2011.5 BMW M3  [10.00]
2004 BMW M3  [10.00]
M4 GTS | Evo Magazine Review

BIMMERPOST
     Featured on BIMMERPOST.com
Source: http://www.evo.co.uk/bmw/m4-gts/1762...is-it-worth-it
Quote:
BMW M4 GTS review - more than twice the price of a regular M4, but is it worth it?

by DAN PROSSER | 13 APR 2016


VERDICT: The fastest BMW ever is also the most thrilling M car for a generation
EVO RATING: ★★★★★
PRICE: £120,500
Much improved dynamics and soundtrack
Engine still lacks intensity

What is it?

The M4 GTS is the fastest production BMW ever. With a 190mph top speed it easily outpaces almost any other BMW you care to mention, most of which are limited to 155mph.

But there’s much more to the M4 GTS than speed alone. It follows in a long line of faster and more focussed versions of BMW’s M3 coupe – including the E30 M3 Sport Evo, the E46 M3 CSL and the E92 M3 GTS – and it adheres to the same formula of more power, less weight and sharper driving dynamics.

The M4 GTS will be limited to 700 units worldwide with just 30 coming to the UK.

Engine, transmission and 0-60mph time

The standard car’s 3-litre twin turbo straight six is carried over almost wholesale, albeit with one crucial upgrade. A water injection system sprays a fine mist directly into the air chamber to reduce intake temperatures, which has enabled BMW’s engineers to turn up boost pressures.

As a result power is up to 493bhp with torque rising to 442lb ft – increases of 68bhp and 36lb ft over the base model. The five-litre water tank is located within the boot floor and in track use it needs to be refilled with each fuel tank refill.

The only transmission option is a seven-speed DCT twin clutch item, driving the rear wheels via BMW’s active M differential. BMW quotes a 0-62mph time of 3.8 seconds, but to see the full set of figures that we recorded when we had the car, pick up issue 222 of the magazine.



Technical highlights

The engineers at BMW’s M division focussed their attentions on the chassis and weight reduction. The stock springs and dampers have therefore been replaced by three-way adjustable coilovers, with 16 clicks for rebound, 14 clicks in high speed compression and six in low speed compression. On top of that there’s a 15mm window of adjustment for the ride height.

The anti-roll bars are thicker to limit body roll and the suspension kinematics have been retuned specifically for the GTS, too. It all means the M4 GTS should be a much more aggressive car in dynamic terms than a standard M4, with a wide range of adjustment to allow owners to tweak their cars for specific circuits and road use. Additionally, the front splitter and rear wing are adjustable.

The tyres are Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2s and the steering has been revised to be more immediate and direct. The standard-fit wheels are forged, lightweight items measuring 19-inches on the front axle and 20-inches on the rear, with a distinctive Acid Orange accent. BMW also offers carbon compound wheels for the GTS, which save 7kgs of unsprung weight. At close to £10,000, however, they do not come cheap.

Like the standard M4 the GTS gets a carbon fibre roof and tailgate, plus a carbon fibre bonnet. The titanium exhaust saves 7kg and the rear seats have been thrown out to save weight, too. The fronts, meanwhile, are bucket seats that are half the weight of the standard items. Despite those measures the weight saving over a DCT-equipped M4 is a relatively modest 30kg.

A no-cost option is the Clubsport package, which most buyers are opting for. It includes a roll cage, fire extinguisher and harnesses. Carbon ceramic brakes are included in the list price.

What’s it like to drive?

We first tried the GTS at Catalunya circuit, Spain, in BMW’s recommended track setting before driving it in the UK in the road setup. On circuit the M4 GTS is every bit as focussed and uncompromising as you’d hope it to be. Whereas the standard car can feel quite short of body control, particularly at the rear axle, the GTS corners flatly and feels superbly locked down with none of the unsettling vertical motions that characterise the base model.

Its front axle responds instantaneously to steering inputs – incidentally the steering feels much more direct and communicative here than it does in the standard car – and it holds a line with real resilience and barely a trace of understeer. With more power and torque to distribute the rear axle is still easily overwhelmed, but, on track at least, the car is actually very fluid and languid in the way it moves from neutrality into oversteer – rather than being spikey and difficult to control.

Combined with the bucket seats, harnesses and suede-trimmed steering wheel the chassis upgrades give the GTS much of the precision and immediacy of a competition car. It feels a world apart from the standard M4.

The engine feels stronger than it does that model, too, but it’s very similar in character and delivery – that’s to say it has sharp throttle response with very minimal turbo lag and a useful top end, but none of the fireworks in the run towards the limiter that made the M3 GTS such a delight. The titanium exhaust, however, does give the M4 GTS an entirely different sonic character to the base model with a loud, crackling exhaust note under full throttle. Although the DCT gearbox feels off the pace of the latest twin clutch transmissions the shift speeds are far from lazy or ponderous.



On the road you need to tread carefully around the Cup 2 tyres when they haven’t got heat in them but it is a truly thrilling machine. The road settings for the suspension don’t turn the GTS into a cosseting cruiser, but they soften things sufficiently to let it cope well with B-road bumps and although you’ll still find it distracted by cambers, you’re not left fighting the car. Perhaps more remarkably, it’s sufficiently habitable that you wouldn’t mind doing a decent motorway journey to reach a trackday, even if it was as far away as the Nurburgring.

If it sounds loud on track, it sounds positively bombastic on the road when the powertrain is in Sport or Sport+ mode. It also feels really light. The weight saving compared to a standard M4 might only amount to 30kg, but such is the increase in agility that it feels more like 300kg. The balance is also tremendously confidence inspiring in that way that a front-engined rear-wheel drive car should be.

The boosted torque can certainly make the rear end snap out of line quickly, but all the tools are there to let you catch it. The MDM setting for the DSC feels like it could be a little less restrictive, the steering wheel rim still feels a bit fat and there isn’t a top end to the revs that you want to chase, but to drive the GTS quickly is to be immersed in an utterly beguiling driving experience.

Rivals

With two seats, a six-figure price tag, the best part of 500bhp and a very clear trackday remit the M4 GTS is similar in many ways to the Porsche 911 GT3 and GT3 RS. The Jaguar F-type SVR is faster and more powerful still, but at £110,000 is undercuts the M4 GTS by almost £12,000.

Price

Costing £120,770 the M4 GTS is more than twice the price of a standard M4. With 700 units set to be built it will also be far less exclusive than the M3 GTS, which was limited to just 150 examples and is highly collectable as a result.
Appreciate 1
      04-13-2016, 06:54 PM   #2
Powerslide
Colonel
United_States
1095
Rep
2,287
Posts

Drives: 2018 F80 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago Illinois USA

iTrader: (0)

Nice review!!
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2016, 09:33 PM   #3
afadeev
Colonel
afadeev's Avatar
1163
Rep
2,561
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

This review reads less like car guy's feedback, and more like something an English major was forced to submit on short notice when her high school paper was due.

What the @#$^ is the following supposed to mean: "car is actually very fluid and languid in the way it moves from neutrality into oversteer – rather than being spikey and difficult to control" ?
__________________
'19 TM3P (BK/BK)
'15 F80 M3 (SO/SS)
ex-'17 I01 i3-BEV (PB/DD), ex-'15 I01 i3-REX, ex-E90, E46, E36's, E30's
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2016, 11:51 AM   #4
vladberca
Major General
vladberca's Avatar
Romania
763
Rep
5,560
Posts

Drives: '18 octavia 2.0 tdi dsg
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Craiova

iTrader: (0)

I would like to see a comparative against the F Type SVR
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2016, 08:13 PM   #5
jml
Major
jml's Avatar
128
Rep
1,144
Posts

Drives: X5M, GT3RS, GT4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vladberca View Post
I would like to see a comparative against the F Type SVR
It's a terrible handling car (F-Type). I don't think it would be a good comparison. F-type sounds too good...would not be a contest playing the game the F-type knows how to play.
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 10:05 AM   #6
castilla
Second Lieutenant
51
Rep
230
Posts

Drives: 2014 M4
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: tr

iTrader: (0)

Why no videos?
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 10:40 AM   #7
VCP
Colonel
VCP's Avatar
Canada
1390
Rep
2,336
Posts

Drives: M4GTS BSM/F90comp/BSM M2CS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by afadeev
This review reads less like car guy's feedback, and more like something an English major was forced to submit on short notice when her high school paper was due.

What the @#$^ is the following supposed to mean: "car is actually very fluid and languid in the way it moves from neutrality into oversteer – rather than being spikey and difficult to control" ?
Yes they are not speaking American.
Appreciate 4
      04-18-2016, 10:43 AM   #8
Sedan_Clan
Law Enforcer
Sedan_Clan's Avatar
Brazil
24826
Rep
22,224
Posts

Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!

iTrader: (26)

Nice!
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 10:57 AM   #9
jeff@autocouture
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
jeff@autocouture's Avatar
963
Rep
13,780
Posts


Drives: 2002 E53 X5 4.6is
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Can't wait
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 11:09 AM   #10
MiamiFan13
Lieutenant
495
Rep
439
Posts

Drives: i4-e40 335i 03 Cobra,Jeep SRT8
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Connecticut

iTrader: (1)

Reviewing this cars performance is just a formality. It's ridiculously overpriced and I imagine 99% of those who buy it will store it rather than drive it to within 10% of its true potential.
Appreciate 6
      04-18-2016, 11:20 AM   #11
Bashful
Private First Class
Canada
161
Rep
137
Posts

Drives: Some Germans
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Canuck

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by MiamiFan13 View Post
Reviewing this cars performance is just a formality. It's ridiculously overpriced and I imagine 99% of those who buy it will store it rather than drive it to within 10% of its true potential.

I think all the owners on this board would disagree with you on all fronts there... and it looks like the allocation to Bimmerpost is higher than many countries.
Appreciate 1
      04-18-2016, 11:24 AM   #12
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2252
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

She sure looks good dancing around the corners
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 12:56 PM   #13
FormulaMMM
Brigadier General
FormulaMMM's Avatar
United_States
3663
Rep
3,422
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by afadeev View Post
This review reads less like car guy's feedback, and more like something an English major was forced to submit on short notice when her high school paper was due.

What the @#$^ is the following supposed to mean: "car is actually very fluid and languid in the way it moves from neutrality into oversteer – rather than being spikey and difficult to control" ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VCP View Post
Yes they are not speaking American.
Allow me to translate --

When them rear tires break loose, you can catch her just like muddin' in Buford's Chevy wit a fresh set of Mickey Thompson's.
__________________
M4 GTS, GT3, C63 S | E90 M3s, E39 M5

Appreciate 1
      04-18-2016, 03:37 PM   #14
VCP
Colonel
VCP's Avatar
Canada
1390
Rep
2,336
Posts

Drives: M4GTS BSM/F90comp/BSM M2CS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

A+ American lingy 101 Awesome!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaMMM View Post
Allow me to translate --

When them rear tires break loose, you can catch her just like muddin' in Buford's Chevy wit a fresh set of Mickey Thompson's.
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2016, 05:41 PM   #15
Rik84
Full Potato
Canada
338
Rep
410
Posts

Drives: 2015 F80 M3
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vancouver BC

iTrader: (0)

If I am to believe everything on the inter webs over the last month - the M2 is still better.
Appreciate 1
      04-18-2016, 11:32 PM   #16
nate340
Enlisted Member
6
Rep
40
Posts

Drives: 135i
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by afadeev View Post
This review reads less like car guy's feedback, and more like something an English major was forced to submit on short notice when her high school paper was due.

What the @#$^ is the following supposed to mean: "car is actually very fluid and languid in the way it moves from neutrality into oversteer – rather than being spikey and difficult to control" ?
You're an idiot, I love how British magazines vividly explain the handling dynamics of a car.
Appreciate 2
      04-19-2016, 12:44 AM   #17
Powaup
Brigadier General
Powaup's Avatar
United_States
1252
Rep
3,688
Posts

Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [10.00]
Can't wait for a review against svr gt3 and gt4
__________________
Check out my YouTube Channel Powaup
Instagram: @ Powaup
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2016, 04:32 PM   #18
Robcut1
Second Lieutenant
112
Rep
267
Posts

Drives: 2016 M4GTS
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jupiter, Fl

iTrader: (1)

I am now undecided since I was all in at MSRP, but now found out I will be paying the market adjustment. At $135k, still more expensive than the Ftype SVR, but more hardcore even if the jag is unmistakably more beautiful. Better track numbers for the less expensive GTR, and the Z06. Close to the same track numbers for the much less expensive GT350R and apparently the upcoming ZL1. Standard run of the mill 911S close in both performance and cost, even though the base 911 is a $100,000 car and contains all of the parts of a $100,000 car. Contrast this with what the M4 is built on as the base car. Essentially, a $40,000 428i, that has an extra $40,000 worth of performance upgrades, but is marked of 400% instead of 200%.
Compare that with a GT3, that has maybe an additional 20k of upgrades, and has been marked up 35% instead of 20%. Bottom line is I am not sure that I would justify paying even the same amount of money for a car that has the basic underpinnings of a 40k car verses a car with the basic underpinnings of a 100k car. Let alone "market adjustment ". The porsche and jags are without question beautiful cars. The GTS, is very cool. To me, therefore, it all comes down to the price of being "exclusive ".
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2016, 05:39 PM   #19
PNWM3
Lieutenant
United_States
526
Rep
577
Posts

Drives: 2023 BMW XM
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Seattle, WA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robcut1 View Post
I am now undecided since I was all in at MSRP, but now found out I will be paying the market adjustment. At $135k, still more expensive than the Ftype SVR, but more hardcore even if the jag is unmistakably more beautiful. Better track numbers for the less expensive GTR, and the Z06. Close to the same track numbers for the much less expensive GT350R and apparently the upcoming ZL1. Standard run of the mill 911S close in both performance and cost, even though the base 911 is a $100,000 car and contains all of the parts of a $100,000 car. Contrast this with what the M4 is built on as the base car. Essentially, a $40,000 428i, that has an extra $40,000 worth of performance upgrades, but is marked of 400% instead of 200%.
Compare that with a GT3, that has maybe an additional 20k of upgrades, and has been marked up 35% instead of 20%. Bottom line is I am not sure that I would justify paying even the same amount of money for a car that has the basic underpinnings of a 40k car verses a car with the basic underpinnings of a 100k car. Let alone "market adjustment ". The porsche and jags are without question beautiful cars. The GTS, is very cool. To me, therefore, it all comes down to the price of being "exclusive ".
What are they asking over sticker?
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2016, 06:13 PM   #20
Robcut1
Second Lieutenant
112
Rep
267
Posts

Drives: 2016 M4GTS
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Jupiter, Fl

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PNWM3 View Post
What are they asking over sticker?
They will not commit yet. I paid $3500 over from them for my 1 series M. I thought that my M2 was going to be MSRP, but they then asked for $5000 over. I settled and bought it for MSRP plus $2500 on Saturday.

Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of having what is being marketed as a pure track car that is able to be driven on a regular basis. I just feel that there are cars that can do as well on the track for less money, or cars that offer a bit more nostalgia, romance and daily drivers that perform almost as well on the track for the same amount of money.

I would to hear the counterpoint from others, who believe the GTS is the way to go for the money (how it is better for the money than the competition). I realize that without anyone actually driving the car, it is all speculation based on aesthetics and performance numbers without the opportunity to experience the emotion of driving.
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2016, 10:18 PM   #21
Jay-K
Brigadier General
Jay-K's Avatar
Indonesia
379
Rep
3,450
Posts

Drives: Slow
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: LA

iTrader: (0)

should be on point with gt3..
sorry as much as I love it it's just not in the same price range as RS and I still do believe the RS will blow out GTSin a heart beat.
__________________
"Well, there's a straight-six engine at the front, a manual gearbox in the middle and drive goes to the back. That's Page 1, Chapter 1 from the petrosexual handbook" - JC
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2016, 01:20 AM   #22
Ghostriderf80
Banned
United Kingdom
840
Rep
1,271
Posts

Drives: Just a Porsche
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Netz

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Law View Post
The question is - How much would it cost to take an M4 and make it into a GTS or faster?

Ohlins, spoiler, seats, tune, exhaust, wheels. I bet you could make a better looking car without the rear lights , but nonetheless something that would be just as fast if not faster.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.




f80post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST