08-24-2015, 04:03 PM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
62
Rep 290
Posts |
Question of tire setup for the track
I've seen a few posts on the 245 square setup being ideal for the F30. Why would that be better than than a 245F/265R setup? Seems to me the larger contact patch in the rear would be beneficial.
|
08-24-2015, 09:46 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
50
Rep 1,730
Posts |
The staggered setup actually makes the car understeer more. Additionally you can rotate tires front to back, or even cross rotate if they aren't directional. This spreads the wear more evenly and allows you to get more life from the tires.
Unless you are running a 911 or corvette, I don't think you *need* the additional rubber in the back. It's great for drag racing, and looks really cool, but most track rats want a square setup. The M3 guys seem to go with larger fronts to match large rears. Not sure if you have the fenders to do that. Wider tires are also more $$$.
__________________
UNDRSTR
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-24-2015, 10:15 PM | #3 |
Second Lieutenant
62
Rep 290
Posts |
Thanks Drob. While I've got you, are you in the Michelin PSS or the Potenza RE-11 camp for the track?
And would I go 245/35/19 or 245/40/19 or something else? Last edited by RacrX; 08-24-2015 at 10:34 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-25-2015, 06:53 PM | #4 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
50
Rep 1,730
Posts |
Quote:
About the tire size, I don't own an F30 so I can't give you the best advice. Ideally, run something that is cheaper and meets the load rating. The shorter sidewall should be less compliant and make steering more direct. Smaller rolling circumference will make the gearing shorter and probably make the car accelerate better.
__________________
UNDRSTR
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2015, 12:41 PM | #5 |
Private
25
Rep 98
Posts |
I've been collecting components for my F30 335i MSport in preparation for the fall BMWCCA HPDE at Hallett over Labor Day weekend. In the tire department, I went with 245/35/19's and got the RE11's. I bought Apex wheels as part of the group buy last spring and wound up going with 19's . I debated about 18's vs 19's, but found conflicting information about fitment. Since it was a group buy, I wasn't going to risk buying 18's and not having them fit over my M Performance brake setup with a no return policy. The biggest down side that I discovered with having 19's vs 18's is the selection of tires. The RE11's were the only XL rated tire in the 245/35/19 size in the extreme performance category on Tire Rack. You can step down a performance category and find more selection, but that wasn't what I wanted.
I will be busy this weekend finishing up the installation of my parts collection. I've already installed the braided brake lines and swapped out for higher temp fluid. I need to install the camber plates and swap out the brake pads. Cannot wait for Saturday the 5th to try it all out. Should be a lot of fun! |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2015, 02:53 PM | #6 | |
Second Lieutenant
62
Rep 290
Posts |
Quote:
Cool! What's your suspension setup? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2015, 05:53 PM | #7 |
Private
25
Rep 98
Posts |
Since my cars are daily drivers and I don't want to lower them for clearance concerns, I try to keep the suspension as close to factory as possible. My F30 has the M sport suspension with the DHP package. I am adding camber plates simply to extend the life of the tires. The camber plates are Ground Control touring. I resisted adding camber plates on my E46 ZHP only to chew through a set of front BFG Rivals way too quickly. With the camber plates installed, the outside edge of the front tires doesn't take near the beating.
The other changes that I mentioned were the Apex wheels, RE11's (I am running square), and track focused pads (Porterfield R4's all around) and fluid (the pads and fluid, to me, are safety items). The braided brake lines look nice, but I cannot say that I've noticed any difference in brake feel due to them. The car has less than 30,000 miles, so the factory lines are still pretty fresh. The one additional thing that I would like to change is the sway bars to stiffen up the roll, but that will wait for another day. So, what's your setup? |
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2015, 06:31 PM | #8 | |
Second Lieutenant
62
Rep 290
Posts |
Quote:
Just stock M sport so far, I've only had the car since last month. Seriously considering coilovers (probably BC racing) for handling, a slight drop over stock, and the ability to adjust for daily or track use. I'll probably do tires first, square setup probably with the RE-11s as well but also considering Advans, Pole Positions, Direzzas and PSSs...will do a bit more research between now and then. Will go with EBC Yellowstuff pads, I've had good luck with them in the past, and Motul fluid. I originally wanted to do sway bars, but they're just too expensive with install. Thinking about a strut tower brace as well, it's worth a shot for the money. I'd love to hear more about the camber plates, my tech was suggesting the GCs...aside from saving your tires, how do they affect handling on the track? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-26-2015, 08:13 PM | #9 | |
Private
25
Rep 98
Posts |
Quote:
On the camber plates, my information will be from autocrossing my E46 ZHP. I purchased a set of 17" E46 sport rims, which are staggered, for autocross and track duty. I ran the car in autocrosses prior to the camber plates and was reasonably happy with the handling, but not tire wear, as I noted. When I finally installed the camber plates, it really balanced the car's handling giving a nice balance of over/under steer (pushed hard enough and/or ham fisted enough, I could induce either, but driven well, it is nicely balanced). Of course, auto crossing is a different animal compared to track driving, and I didn't track the car prior to the camber plate install. When I did take the car to the track, I really liked the balance. What I didn't like was the roll. So, I wound up installing H&R sway bars, front and rear. These really firmed the car up in roll. It's amazing how much roll there was, even though I didn't realize it at first. The nice thing about sway bars is that they don't really show up in normal, daily driving, but really shine in sporting situations. So, all of these experiences brought me to where I am with the F30. I decided that a square setup would be better (I can rotate the tires to even out the wear and reduce under steer) and that camber plates were a necessity. I will have to see on the sway bars. I would feel more confident tackling them if there were a Bentley Manual (or equivalent) available. The Ground Control camber plates seem like quality pieces. From what I've read and discussed with them, the ones I purchased are their most up to date version. Earlier F30 plates (at least one, if not two iterations) had issues that you can find threads about. I have been very happy with the ones for my E46 and I'm sure I will be happy with these going forward. Now I just need to get in the garage and install them. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2015, 06:05 AM | #10 | |
Brigadier General
1604
Rep 3,940
Posts |
Quote:
The stiffer sway bars are, the more linked the left and right suspension components are which negates the point of "independent" suspension. If the sway bars are stiff enough, ride quality would end up suffering on bumpy, pot-hole ridden roads. As for the F30 RWD, there's a reason why if you have the Sport or M Sport trim, the M Performance Suspension does not require you to replace your sway bars. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2015, 10:05 AM | #11 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
50
Rep 1,730
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
UNDRSTR
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2015, 10:20 AM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
1604
Rep 3,940
Posts |
Quote:
Tires are the most important. Spring/shock or coilovers are your next bang for the buck improvement. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-28-2015, 07:06 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant General
3187
Rep 10,509
Posts |
OP, I'd go with RE-11. I switched my M3 from PSS to RE11 just the other day due to the greasiness of PSS at the track. PSS are a great street commuter tire but not my choice for a track tire
I'd go 245 front 265 rear instead of 245 square to get more traction on corner exit |
Appreciate
0
|
09-01-2015, 09:45 AM | #15 |
Lieutenant
162
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2013 F30 335i 8SA M-Adaptive
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, Tx (Frisco)
|
OP, I'm going to advise against the RE-11's
I had them for a season and there's just better tires out there for the money. The RE-11's didn't have the heat tolerance of other tires in the bunch Since then I've had Hankook RS3's and Federal 595 RS-R's The Hankook's have amazing heat tolerance, wear well (for UTQG 200 tires) and stick like glue - I would buy them again Currently I have the Federal 595 RS-R's on the car - They're relatively new and a little hard to find (google for them and you'll find a supplier) but they're CHEAP (as in ~$600 a set instead of $1200). I read good things about them and figured hell for half price I'd give them a shot. Verdict - they're great tires. They're every bit as sticky as the Hankooks were (maybe even a little stickier), they tolerate the heat just as well. They are wearing a touch faster than the Hankook's did (I track tire wear in an excel spreadsheet because I'm like that) but at half price who cares. Downside is they're currently rated as UTQG160 tires - which if you compete in SCCA autocross is currently considered a R compound tire and puts you outside of street and street touring. Hopefully Federal will do what the other tire manufacturers did 2 years ago and start stamping them 200 to deal with the regulation change. Other down side, they make a little annoying noise when cruising ~30-45 miles an hour - above that and below that they behave. It seems to have gotten better as the tread has worn down. Now for tires I haven't driven - mentioned above the Bridgestone RE-71R - it will be the next tire I put on my car. They're pricy (but basically in-line with the other competitors) but they are the hands down stand out grip leader of the UTQG200 tires. One of my friends did a back to back test at one of our autocrosses swapping between the RE-71R and his Hoosier A6's (basically the stickiest rubber on the planet) and the 71R's were only 1 second slower on a 50 second track. I am sold - price be damned As to fitment - I have H&R sport springs and use Apex Arc-8 18x9 wheels with ET42. I run a 3mm spacer in the front and run 265/35R18's on all 4 corners - yes they fit, no they don't rub. Square is defiantly the way to go for performance and for tire life - your rears will wear the inner band and the fronts will wear the outer shoulder - rotating them front to back gets you a lot of extra life - also flipping the tires on the rims at about the half-way point gets you more life as well because the inner shoulder is relatively un-abused.
__________________
Last edited by utenigma; 09-01-2015 at 10:04 AM.. |
Appreciate
1
|
09-01-2015, 10:04 AM | #16 |
Lieutenant
162
Rep 573
Posts
Drives: 2013 F30 335i 8SA M-Adaptive
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, Tx (Frisco)
|
If anybody's interested this is his data from those runs
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2016, 02:02 AM | #19 |
Captain
121
Rep 749
Posts
Drives: 2016 528i Executive Edition
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Vancouver
|
Anyone else try these federal 595?
Im starting to look for tires for the coming season. I'm looking for tires for a dedicated set track wheels (apex arc-8 in 8.5x18 square) . Utenigma's review is making them a very attractive option at around $520 shipped for a set. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2016, 07:33 PM | #20 | |
First Lieutenant
44
Rep 349
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2013 EBII 328i M-Sport 6MT, M-Performance Brakes, M-Performance Suspension, APEX Arc-8 18 x 8.5 square, Pilot SS
1999 EB1 M3 - Bilstein PSS9, Vorshlag Camber Plates, Kosei K1, ZII Star Spec, PFC, gallon of distilled water. Last edited by ronin951; 02-15-2016 at 07:40 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2016, 07:38 PM | #21 |
First Lieutenant
44
Rep 349
Posts |
+1 on the PSS being greasy. I've run NT05's and Z2 Star Specs. Out of the three PSS were the worst. For some reason the used and abused NT05's were slower than new Z2's
__________________
2013 EBII 328i M-Sport 6MT, M-Performance Brakes, M-Performance Suspension, APEX Arc-8 18 x 8.5 square, Pilot SS
1999 EB1 M3 - Bilstein PSS9, Vorshlag Camber Plates, Kosei K1, ZII Star Spec, PFC, gallon of distilled water. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-14-2016, 04:15 PM | #22 | |
Lieutenant General
3187
Rep 10,509
Posts |
Quote:
I've used PSS, Kumho MX, Azenis RT615, Dunlop ZII and RE11 at the track on a variety of cars, and I liked the ZII and RE11 the best. I got the RE11 for my F80 due to sizing they came in, and would have gotten RE71R or Rival if the sizing worked out I was at chuckwallar this weekend and RE11 held up well. Wear was fine and they lasted for 25 minutes (only starting to get greasy at end of the session). Others with stock F80 had PSS and the outer sidewall was toast just from the weekend. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|