BMW
X1 / X2
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums Professional Motorsport Racing Discussion (IMSA, DTM, Formula 1, Grand-AM, Le Mans, IRL, WRC, etc..) FIA taking action on Red Bulls flexible rear wing

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      05-17-2021, 01:56 PM   #155
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
Belgium
62741
Rep
24,511
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT Silverstone II
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ngilbe36 View Post
This Thread is about flexible rear wings
I didn't asked anything . I responded to a question from the man in question " MKSixer "
Mate . Do you understand ?

Check post # 142
Attached Images
 
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.
Appreciate 1
M5Rick58881.00
      05-17-2021, 03:04 PM   #156
yco
i'm just saying
yco's Avatar
5723
Rep
2,634
Posts

Drives: E71 X6M '10 (sold)
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Istanbul & Kyiv

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium View Post
MAX was the moral winner of race 1 at Bahrain . .Everyone knows that !

So I have to post the red line again .Why ? That's why ....
mate with that red line.. its not aligned with where wheel bearings are facing..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ngilbe36 View Post
This Thread is about flexible rear wings
but the topic itself is getting flexible as well like always how great Max "supposed to be"..
__________________
"Race car driving is like sex. All guys think they're good at it." Jay Leno
Appreciate 2
MKSixer34171.50
minn1913970.00
      05-17-2021, 03:16 PM   #157
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
Belgium
62741
Rep
24,511
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT Silverstone II
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
mate with that red line.. its not aligned with where wheel bearings are facing..



but the topic itself is getting flexible as well like always how great Max "supposed to be"..
Mate listen to this ...
As you know I'm not religious at all .But I'll try to pray for you anyway ..

'In Nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti'
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.
Appreciate 1
M5Rick58881.00
      05-17-2021, 03:17 PM   #158
inTgr8r
Lieutenant General
inTgr8r's Avatar
Canada
2422
Rep
11,665
Posts

Drives: M2 Comp
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
mate with that red line.. its not aligned with where wheel bearings are facing..
Exactly!
Perspective angle is completely ignored.
Plus the fact that VER had to go to full opposite lock with the steering to complete the pass which resulted in the off track excursion to complete the pass.
Appreciate 3
yco5722.50
MKSixer34171.50
      05-17-2021, 03:26 PM   #159
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
Belgium
62741
Rep
24,511
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT Silverstone II
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by inTgr8r View Post
Exactly!
Perspective angle is completely ignored.
Plus the fact that VER had to go to full opposite lock with the steering to complete the pass which resulted in the off track excursion to complete the pass.
How about a rear angle ?

It's just one of "29....At Bahrain !
Attached Images
 
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.
Appreciate 1
M5Rick58881.00
      05-17-2021, 03:31 PM   #160
yco
i'm just saying
yco's Avatar
5723
Rep
2,634
Posts

Drives: E71 X6M '10 (sold)
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Istanbul & Kyiv

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///M Power-Belgium View Post
Mate listen to this ...
As you know I'm not religious at all .But I'll try to pray for you anyway ..

'In Nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti'
ok thank you mate..
__________________
"Race car driving is like sex. All guys think they're good at it." Jay Leno
Appreciate 0
      05-17-2021, 03:35 PM   #161
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10473
Rep
4,815
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics..

Merc's fin vibrates, Red Bull's rear wing bends.. lets separate them first..

and even if we assume your conspiracy is right.. bending rear wing gives a vast amount of advantage.. you dont need to be an aerodynamicist to know this..

yes i agree with one part that, they re ahead of time..
It's not a consipracy.
Seeing something flapping around and not understanding it's true purpose is a limitation to us.
Yes we can understand the RB wing sagging (or at least we think we can). That doesn't mean we can understand the merc fin flapping.
I can think of a dozen reasons for that finn to flap (maybe it creates a turbulance that hits the wing just at a certain spot, maybe it creates a turbulance that just misses the wing at a certain spot. Maybe it steers a turbulance in a corner to guide it to one side or maybe it steers the turbulance to guide it to the other side.
Whatever it does, it'll probably be way to complicated to understand its exact workings for any of us.

At the point that you start using relativation to the workings of an F1 car (like: "you dont need to be an aerodynamicist to know this" or "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.. "), you are way way out of your leage claiming to understand the workings of an F1 car.
None of us understands it.
I've worked 3 times in a windtunnel. Did some CFD modelling (Euler and Navier Stokes), but I don't presume to understand. Not even that RB sagging wing. In reality modelling and testing that effect will be way way to complicated for us. Even designing a non sagging wing is way to complicated for us.
I'm pretty sure that if we would design a sagging wing, it would still be the worst performing wing in the field. By a mile.

Saying something like "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.." has no added value in this discussion. It's like saying water is wet. Stating the obvious.
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t
Appreciate 3
      05-17-2021, 03:36 PM   #162
///M Power-Belgium
General
///M Power-Belgium's Avatar
Belgium
62741
Rep
24,511
Posts

Drives: ///M3-E92-DCT Silverstone II
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
ok thank you mate..
Amen !
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion

BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod.
Appreciate 1
M5Rick58881.00
      05-17-2021, 04:39 PM   #163
MKSixer
Lieutenant General
MKSixer's Avatar
34172
Rep
11,637
Posts

Drives: 2015 BMW i8, E63 M6, 328d
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Southeast United States

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2016 M4 GTS (Allotted)  [0.00]
2013 BMW 328d  [0.00]
2007 BMW M6  [10.00]
2015 BMW i8  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
It's not a consipracy.
Seeing something flapping around and not understanding it's true purpose is a limitation to us.
Yes we can understand the RB wing sagging (or at least we think we can). That doesn't mean we can understand the merc fin flapping.
I can think of a dozen reasons for that finn to flap (maybe it creates a turbulance that hits the wing just at a certain spot, maybe it creates a turbulance that just misses the wing at a certain spot. Maybe it steers a turbulance in a corner to guide it to one side or maybe it steers the turbulance to guide it to the other side.
Whatever it does, it'll probably be way to complicated to understand its exact workings for any of us.

At the point that you start using relativation to the workings of an F1 car (like: "you dont need to be an aerodynamicist to know this" or "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.. "), you are way way out of your leage claiming to understand the workings of an F1 car.
None of us understands it.
I've worked 3 times in a windtunnel. Did some CFD modelling (Euler and Navier Stokes), but I don't presume to understand. Not even that RB sagging wing. In reality modelling and testing that effect will be way way to complicated for us. Even designing a non sagging wing is way to complicated for us.
I'm pretty sure that if we would design a sagging wing, it would still be the worst performing wing in the field. By a mile.

Saying something like "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.." has no added value in this discussion. It's like saying water is wet. Stating the obvious.
I actually worked on CF when it became more popular as a structural material in 1983 and 1984. I stated in a post the proper way to make the material behave with my knowledge and I don't have the information a top tier F1 team has. If anyone believes that they can't do this in light of evidence that they have...it's a pretty amazing.

Thanks for your post. It is very helpful!!
__________________
Several actors have played James Bond, Sean Connery IS James Bond...
Sir 7ewis, 7X FIA Formula One World Championship, World Driving Champion. 100 Wins. 101 Pole Positions. 54 Fastest Laps. Actual Rain Master. Leave me to it, Bono. One Race Win in each of his 15 years in F1. Most Laps Led in Formula One. The Centurion.
Appreciate 0
      05-17-2021, 04:52 PM   #164
yco
i'm just saying
yco's Avatar
5723
Rep
2,634
Posts

Drives: E71 X6M '10 (sold)
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Istanbul & Kyiv

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
It's not a consipracy.
Seeing something flapping around and not understanding it's true purpose is a limitation to us.
Yes we can understand the RB wing sagging (or at least we think we can). That doesn't mean we can understand the merc fin flapping.
I can think of a dozen reasons for that finn to flap (maybe it creates a turbulance that hits the wing just at a certain spot, maybe it creates a turbulance that just misses the wing at a certain spot. Maybe it steers a turbulance in a corner to guide it to one side or maybe it steers the turbulance to guide it to the other side.
Whatever it does, it'll probably be way to complicated to understand its exact workings for any of us.

At the point that you start using relativation to the workings of an F1 car (like: "you dont need to be an aerodynamicist to know this" or "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.. "), you are way way out of your leage claiming to understand the workings of an F1 car.
None of us understands it.
I've worked 3 times in a windtunnel. Did some CFD modelling (Euler and Navier Stokes), but I don't presume to understand. Not even that RB sagging wing. In reality modelling and testing that effect will be way way to complicated for us. Even designing a non sagging wing is way to complicated for us.
I'm pretty sure that if we would design a sagging wing, it would still be the worst performing wing in the field. By a mile.

Saying something like "nothing on any car is "rigid" there is nothing like infinite rigidity in physics.." has no added value in this discussion. It's like saying water is wet. Stating the obvious.
thank you for the long post.. but one thing i ve said which was clear for everybody was bending rear wings benefit.. if you want to be skeptic about it, i respect.. but i do believe 100% it has benefit in the end for RB..

for Merc's fin.. its not obvious yes maybe they dont want to make it more rigid by adding 200g of more carbon.. maybe less weight is better than vibration at that point.. maybe the things you ve said.. nobody except Merc' engineers really knows that.. but RB's obvious..
__________________
"Race car driving is like sex. All guys think they're good at it." Jay Leno
Appreciate 0
      05-17-2021, 06:07 PM   #165
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10473
Rep
4,815
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
but RB's obvious..
What is obvious?
Obvious that it has a benefit or obvious in its workings?
I think everything we see has benefit. Because nothing we could ever see on these cars is left to 'coincidence'.
Everything we could possibly see on these cars has been seen by the engineers, and probably has been exactly and carefully engineered in this way. So everything we could ever see on these cars has a benefit. This is stating the obvious. If we don't see that benefit, we just lack the knowledge, aka are too stupid.
As for it's workings: does it change geometry? does it move in or out of a particular turbulance? Does it have a weight advantage? No one here can comment on that. No one here knows it's exact workings. So no one can claim that that is 'obvious'

As for if it's allowed or not... that is something for the FIA to decide.
Currently the car passed all the tests, so what RB is doing is according to the current rules. We have to see how the FIA is going to change the rules (if they are going to) and what the teams then have to do to potentionally comply with these new rules.
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t

Last edited by GuidoK; 05-17-2021 at 06:14 PM..
Appreciate 1
M5Rick58881.00
      05-17-2021, 06:54 PM   #166
yco
i'm just saying
yco's Avatar
5723
Rep
2,634
Posts

Drives: E71 X6M '10 (sold)
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Istanbul & Kyiv

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
What is obvious?
Obvious that it has a benefit or obvious in its workings?
I think everything we see has benefit. Because nothing we could ever see on these cars is left to 'coincidence'.
Everything we could possibly see on these cars has been seen by the engineers, and probably has been exactly and carefully engineered in this way. So everything we could ever see on these cars has a benefit. This is stating the obvious. If we don't see that benefit, we just lack the knowledge, aka are too stupid.
As for it's workings: does it change geometry? does it move in or out of a particular turbulance? Does it have a weight advantage? No one here can comment on that. No one here knows it's exact workings. So no one can claim that that is 'obvious'

As for if it's allowed or not... that is something for the FIA to decide.
Currently the car passed all the tests, so what RB is doing is according to the current rules. We have to see how the FIA is going to change the rules (if they are going to) and what the teams then have to do to potentionally comply with these new rules.
you re saying nothing is a coincidence on these cars.. true..
so RB made a rear wing like this for PR purposes?
__________________
"Race car driving is like sex. All guys think they're good at it." Jay Leno
Appreciate 0
      05-17-2021, 08:11 PM   #167
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10473
Rep
4,815
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by yco View Post
so RB made a rear wing like this for PR purposes?
No, for optimum performance to their abilities.
Just as merc made that rear finn for optimum performance to their abilities.
I have been saying this all the time, so I have no idea why you're now asking me this question.
Have you forgotten what I've written?
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t

Last edited by GuidoK; 05-17-2021 at 08:20 PM..
Appreciate 3
yco5722.50
M5Rick58881.00
      05-18-2021, 01:27 AM   #168
M5Rick
General
M5Rick's Avatar
58881
Rep
19,245
Posts

Drives: M5 F10 DCT Gunmetal
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Southern England

iTrader: (0)

[QUOTE=GuidoK;27599804] obvious?

It is default saying for Merc worshiper should they run out of things to say trying to make out wing is illegal.
Appreciate 1
      05-18-2021, 01:51 AM   #169
SenorFunkyPants
Brigadier General
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
2510
Rep
4,381
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
Currently the car passed all the tests, so what RB is doing is according to the current rules.
I would disagree with that.
The regulations do *not* in any way state that passing any load testing regime indicates that the car is legal.

The latest regulations April 2021 (unchanged over recent years)
,
3.2.2 [....] all aerodynamic components or bodywork influencing
the car’s aerodynamic performance must be rigidly secured and immobile with respect to their frame of reference"

"3.15.1 Introduction of load/deflection tests
In order to ensure that the requirements of Article 3.2.2 are respected, the FIA reserves the right to introduce further load/deflection tests on any part of the bodywork which appears to be (or is suspected of), moving whilst the car is in motion."

ISTM that the load test regulations are designed to ensure compliance not to legitimise.

Last edited by SenorFunkyPants; 05-18-2021 at 04:40 AM..
Appreciate 2
Ngilbe361618.50
MKSixer34171.50
      05-18-2021, 04:06 AM   #170
erikejw
New Member
Sweden
5
Rep
6
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Sweden

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants View Post
I would disagree with that.
The regulations do *not* in any way state that passing any load testing regime indicates that the car is legal.

The latest regulations April 2021
,
3.2.2 [....] all aerodynamic components or bodywork influencing
the car’s aerodynamic performance must be rigidly secured and immobile with respect to their frame of reference"
[....]
"Any device or construction that is designed to bridge the gap between the sprung part of the car and the ground is prohibited under all circumstances."

"3.15.1 Introduction of load/deflection tests
In order to ensure that the requirements of Article 3.2.2 are respected, the FIA reserves the right to introduce further load/deflection tests on any part of the bodywork which appears to be (or is suspected of), moving whilst the car is in motion."

ISTM that the load test regulations are designed to ensure compliance not to legitimise.
In reality it is deemed legal if it passes the load tests. That's is how FIA operate and govern that rule. And that is why they do change the tests from time to time. If they think some component is in the gray zone they can change their testing procedure with some heads up to the teams.
Appreciate 2
M5Rick58881.00
      05-18-2021, 05:05 AM   #171
SenorFunkyPants
Brigadier General
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
2510
Rep
4,381
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by erikejw View Post
In reality it is deemed legal if it passes the load tests. That's is how FIA operate and govern that rule. And that is why they do change the tests from time to time. If they think some component is in the gray zone they can change their testing procedure with some heads up to the teams.

The FIA have surely known Red Bull (and likely some other teams) have been cheating the aero regulations but seemed content to turn a blind eye as long as it evened up the field wrt Mercedes and no one was talking about it.
Once it was talked about then they had to react.
It puts the FIA in a difficult position (in trying to retrospectively punish teams) having been complicit in its blind eye approach to obvious rear wing movement visible in footage from the rear facing cameras since at least last year.
Appreciate 1
AmuroRay2165.00
      05-18-2021, 08:46 AM   #172
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10473
Rep
4,815
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants View Post
I would disagree with that.
The regulations do *not* in any way state that passing any load testing regime indicates that the car is legal.
So the FIA tests the cars before entering the race for nothing?

Be sure to tell the FIA that

The FIA also said:
"The FIA did not suggest any particular team was breaking the rules when informing the 10 squads of the new tests, which come into force on June 15." according to www.formula1.com
So there's your answer I guess .
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t
Appreciate 3
      05-18-2021, 10:07 AM   #173
SenorFunkyPants
Brigadier General
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
2510
Rep
4,381
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
So the FIA tests the cars before entering the race for nothing?
Be sure to tell the FIA that
The FIA also said:
"The FIA did not suggest any particular team was breaking the rules when informing the 10 squads of the new tests, which come into force on June 15." according to www.formula1.com
So there's your answer I guess .
Come on...its really not that complicated....that some teams were circumventing the static loads tests doesn't make their cars legal.
3.2.2 still stands and takes precedence.
In the same way that Ferrari somehow cheated the fuel flow regulations by altering the output data of the fuel flow sensor didn't make their car legal even though the FIA couldn't figure how they were doing it.
Appreciate 0
      05-18-2021, 10:30 AM   #174
M5Rick
General
M5Rick's Avatar
58881
Rep
19,245
Posts

Drives: M5 F10 DCT Gunmetal
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Southern England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants View Post
Come on...its really not that complicated....that some teams were circumventing the static loads tests doesn't make their cars legal.
3.2.2 still stands and takes precedence.
In the same way that Ferrari somehow cheated the fuel flow regulations by altering the output data of the fuel flow sensor didn't make their car legal even though the FIA couldn't figure how they were doing it.
Appreciate 0
      05-18-2021, 10:45 AM   #175
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10473
Rep
4,815
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SenorFunkyPants View Post
Come on...its really not that complicated....that some teams were circumventing the static loads tests doesn't make their cars legal.
So you imply that you know better than the FIA...
What a surprise


Quote:
In the same way that Ferrari somehow cheated the fuel flow regulations by altering the output data of the fuel flow sensor didn't make their car legal even though the FIA couldn't figure how they were doing it.
This is different. It's not that the FIA cant figure out the stiffness of the RB rear wing. It's not that the FIA can't proove something in case of the RB rear wing. RB isn't 'circumventing' any tests. They pass each test as they now stand. It's just that the FIA (or better said: mercedes) thinks that the specs of the tests arent stringent enough.
I cant believe that you think something like that is the same.

And like I said:
"The FIA did not suggest any particular team was breaking the rules when informing the 10 squads of the new tests, which come into force on June 15." according to www.formula1.com

The FIA's current standpoint is that no team is breaking the rules of tests as they now stand.
They are going to change the procedure how rigidness of wings are tested, making the specs of the tests more stringent and give teams the time to adapt.
Doesn't that say all? What don't you understand about these actions?
It means that until those tests are changed and date is set to meet those tests, none of the cars have illegal wings regarding this issue.
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t

Last edited by GuidoK; 05-18-2021 at 10:54 AM..
Appreciate 2
M5Rick58881.00
      05-18-2021, 11:01 AM   #176
SenorFunkyPants
Brigadier General
SenorFunkyPants's Avatar
United Kingdom
2510
Rep
4,381
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuidoK View Post
It's just that the FIA (or better said: mercedes) thinks that the specs of the tests arent stringent enough.
Ah OK got it...I'll leave you to it.
Appreciate 1
Ngilbe361618.50
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.




xbimmers
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST