03-13-2014, 11:41 AM | #89 | |
Major General
592
Rep 5,396
Posts |
Quote:
also, unless you have your own business and want to claim the car as a business vehicle, this tax credit doesn't apply to me, no brainer. no lease at the current terms
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 11:48 AM | #90 |
Private
8
Rep 65
Posts |
I agree with most of this. I'm not a leaser, would likely finance the car. Just tempted by the idea of a LCI M5 and then maybe getting into a LCI M3 later on. I'm going to go drive one today to see how it feels...integral part of the decision making process
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 12:22 PM | #91 |
Lieutenant
23
Rep 550
Posts |
You and only you know why you want either car! Do you want a great family car or a performer? If classy family car suits your needs, M5 it is. I drove one and it was HUGE!!! I can't consider that as an option. I agree that the build quality is very good, but so is a full leather M3/M4.
__________________
On the list for an M4!!
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 12:38 PM | #92 | |
Brigadier General
1253
Rep 3,688
Posts
Drives: 2021 Supra 3.0 (Past: 2015 M23
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
|
Quote:
The lease rates for the F8x are so crappy it actually makes more sense going w/BMW select. At least for me.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 03:49 PM | #93 |
Private
24
Rep 95
Posts |
I go back and forth, sometimes several times a day. I have had both though I think it's hard to compare different generations. I think the biggest problem, or contributor to this dilemma is that there just isn't as much difference in any car any more. Hear me out.....cars in the past had to make more sacrifices to be one thing or the other. Either roomy, or sporty, stylish, or cheep but rarely two of the four. Nowadays the average minivan can break 7 0-60. Honestly, we don't use the performance these cars have. The sacrifices forced character that people could identify with....
Anyway as it stands this afternoon my deposit remains on M3. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 05:07 PM | #94 |
Private
8
Rep 65
Posts |
Sooo….I went on down and drove a loaded 2014 M5, competition package and exec/tech/b&o, and made my decision. It's not for me. But that doesn't in any way imply that it isn't a great car.
Pros: massive power and torque on hand, much better delivery than in my F10 Dinan stage 2 550i. Feels like a tank. Solid, no chassis flex or noticeable body roll when driving. The MDCT is massive good. Much better than Audi's DCT in the S/RS series cars. Sizeable interior with great driving seat and adjustability, although seat ventilation still blows (not literally). Quiet smooth ride in comfort, stiffer but not bone jarring in sport. Steering feedback excellent, heavier than I though it would be. Cons: feels a little too big for my comfort. Doesn't have the nimble feel that the F30 chassis has. On narrower roads feels to me to be right on the edge width-wise. 10.3 mpg during my 20 mile drive of some moderately aggressive and some mild driving. I realize it will probably get better, but still…. Must be in slowest shift speed in average city driving, because if it isn't it will hold onto gears much longer than I would like it to. Once in slowest shift mode drives quite civilly for around town and in traffic. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 05:19 PM | #95 |
Second Lieutenant
63
Rep 287
Posts |
You have the P-car for the track and canyons.
M5 would be perfect for long trips with your family. How many times do you think you will take the M3/4/5 over the P-car on canyon runs/track?
__________________
2010 E93 M3 JB
2013 F10 M5 SG 2015 F82 M4 BSM 2018 F83 M4 MW 2020 F97 X3MC BSM |
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 07:27 PM | #96 | |
Major
574
Rep 1,320
Posts |
Quote:
Last June in Austin at COTA some pretty talented F10 M5 board members went to the launch of the M6GC and got some serious seat time in the M6CG and the M5 and I can tell you the brakes held up well, not as well as the CCB's but as well as my E90 M3 with track pads. As I have an F10 M5 I was fortunate to get about an hours seat time in an M5 as I was not really interested in the M6G. Yes the E90 is more fun to throw around, BUT 155mph on the back straight vs. 135 is intoxicating, also the DSC blinking at 115 as it shifts from 3rd to 4th is pretty amazing. The M5 is an AMAZING car for what it's is capable on the street and track? Heat soak was the issue not the brakes!!! T-minus 7 days to the BMW trifecta at COTA and now I have a brembo BBK the E90 M3 p.s. - the same group has done multiple M Schools as well! N-ring in July in the M4
__________________
Garage:
09 E90 ///M3 | SS | Black | Modded 22 992.1 GT3 | Black | PCCB | LWB | PDK 23 G82 ///M4CSL | AW | Race Buckets | 24 9YO Cayenne TGT | QGM| Burgundy | Neodyne / PCCB |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 09:14 PM | #97 | ||
General
21117
Rep 20,741
Posts
Drives: 2021 911 turbo
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 09:19 PM | #98 |
Captain
168
Rep 773
Posts |
I have an m5 w/ comp pack and an e93 m3. And im supposedly going to have a Gt3 join the stable in may..keeping my fingers crossed.
It's a great complement to what you have. The M5 is a perfect daddy mobile/ family car. My only issue is I live in Washington, D.C. And we had a horrible cold and messy winter. I couldn't drive it much, too much power. So if you live in the north east just make sure you have a winter car! Jeff |
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 09:44 PM | #99 | |
Colonel
552
Rep 2,633
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-13-2014, 10:00 PM | #100 |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Thanks for the solid advice, all. I'm going to test drive one tomorrow. I'm pretty sure I'll know after 5 minutes behind the wheel.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-14-2014, 12:27 PM | #101 |
Major
574
Rep 1,320
Posts |
I stand corrected; my apologies!
__________________
Garage:
09 E90 ///M3 | SS | Black | Modded 22 992.1 GT3 | Black | PCCB | LWB | PDK 23 G82 ///M4CSL | AW | Race Buckets | 24 9YO Cayenne TGT | QGM| Burgundy | Neodyne / PCCB |
Appreciate
0
|
03-14-2014, 06:54 PM | #102 |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
Well, crisis averted. The M5 is absolutely, positively not for me. I mentioned it would take me 5 minutes to know. It took closer to 30 seconds.
I really like the styling and look of the car. I would add a front lip and some spacers, and the car would look pretty awesome. The interior is okay. Maybe I'm Audi and Porsche spoiled. I really dislike the silver trim in the M5. It just doesn't fit the car. I wouldn't want wood trim, and the Piano Black individual option doesn't get rid of all of the silver. Also, I hate sunroofs. I'm way to white. It's entirely too hot in Central FL to have one. I really didn't mind the electric steering and the car seemed smaller than it actually is. I'm sure the competition package adjustments helped the handling quite a bit. Here is what would drive me nuts. My friend, a self-proclaimed purest, gets all fired up about sound being pumped into the cabin on newer cars. I really like the Porsche sound symposer, but I'm now in agreement with my friend. The sound this car makes is really, really bad. I was shocked. All I could think about was the sound. It reminded me very much of a TDI VW Jetta. I knew it wouldn't sound great with a factory exhaust, but I don't think an intake and exhaust is going to make it close to acceptable. It was so bad, I would never be able to get over it. I think the car is too big and there is too much HP for a Manual, but the DCT in this car is a no go for me. The paddles are plastic and feel very cheap. There is little to no rev matching like there is in my S4 or an E9X M3. I drove in Sport Plus modes, and it was still clear this car is designed for comfort. The last thing I'll mention is about the power delivery. It mashes you into the seat but in a very numb way. I don't know how to explain it, but it just doesn't feel fast even while going fast. Maybe that's the point, but I'm out. The last lesson I learned from the exercise is that I'm not going to be able to pre-order an F80 M3 without spending some time in one. If it is anything like this M5, I'm going to have to rethink my plans. Last edited by Money2536; 03-15-2014 at 06:41 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-14-2014, 09:35 PM | #103 |
Resident Engineer
135
Rep 748
Posts |
Very informative. Thanks
__________________
///M4 (SO/BLK/BLK) Exec, LED, Blk 19s, HK, 6MT <- SOLD
///M2 (LBB), Exec, 6MT <- SOLD 2014 Land Cruiser, Slee Sliders, OME Lift, ARB Onboard Air European Delivery Journal & F8X Door Rattle Fix Machine Shop Directory - www.mfgcenter.com |
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2014, 08:40 AM | #104 | |
Brigadier General
1977
Rep 4,225
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2014, 02:51 PM | #105 |
Colonel
1586
Rep 2,148
Posts |
"New hydraulic rack-and-pinion steering with the M-specific Servotronic function with A MORE DIRECT PROGRAMMING to improve agility during cornering."
No wonder I liked that part of the car so much. I seem to be the king of misinformation these days. My bad... |
Appreciate
0
|
03-15-2014, 03:24 PM | #106 |
Brigadier General
1977
Rep 4,225
Posts |
As someone who is going from an E92 M3 to an F10 M5 I enjoyed your take on the M5 even if we differ on its merits.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2014, 12:35 AM | #107 |
Captain
58
Rep 605
Posts |
I went from an e92 m3 to an f10 m5 after having my plans and money set on an M4.
It's the perfect daily driver for someone doing a lot of miles IMO. The comfort, style etc is A+. I have the competition package and feel the car handles extremely well. I got used to the size very quickly and I feel confident throwing her around like the M3. I really like the power delivery and the 7200rpm redline didn't bother me as much as I thought it would be coming from 8600 (tune). The car is wayyyy too quiet stock even with the comp package. BMW needs to have their performance exhaust as the competition exhaust and do whatever else necessary. I'm getting custom built downpipes & connector pipe next week along with BMS Tune so I hope that does the trick. I want the car to be refined when cruising but open up nicely when getting on it. Just couldn't pass up on the lease deals on the m5. $100 more than an m4 more or less.
__________________
2014 M5 Competition Alpine/Sakhir BMS Tune. Undercover Performance Custom Downpipes & Connector. H&R 10mm Spacers. BMW CF Rear Spoiler. IND Cosmetics. ALP & BEL Radar & Laser. 2011 Space Grey E92 M3 AA Gen 2 Lvl 3 586whp 398wtq SAE (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2014, 04:55 PM | #108 | |
First Lieutenant
97
Rep 380
Posts
Drives: M3 CS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Henderson, NV
|
Quote:
Are you being serious? As for the interior, you can call it subjective all you want, but you got to be f**king kidding me! Where do you get the M3 is faster? I supposed you've put them both through an instrumented test? 0-60 MPH I'd guess the M3 is faster, over 60 I'm not too sure that an M3 would hang with the M5. The M5 is an absolute rocket at high speed. You can't use BMW's claimed 0-60 times for reference, they've been proven inaccurate and inconsistent. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2014, 07:58 PM | #109 |
General
31
Rep 235
Posts |
M3 hands down. Have you not heard about all the accolades the M3 gets? M3 is for the real performance enthusiast. M5 is for old farts who just wants to go fast. An M3 beats an M5 any day at the track.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-16-2014, 09:23 PM | #110 | |
General
31
Rep 235
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|