06-25-2014, 11:51 AM | #89 |
Brigadier General
142
Rep 3,523
Posts |
I had an E90 M3 and will be moving away from BMW M cars. Too heavy, fat, overpriced and they have lost their way.
A fully loaded car in Canada is $100k. I'll get a used GT3 from the US or a used 991S instead. Is there anything that special about this car? I know there are tons of fanboys and I was with the E90 M3 but this car is just mehhhh. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 12:18 PM | #90 |
Colonel
131
Rep 2,408
Posts |
Have you thought about getting a new 981 cayman S? I find them to be more enjoyable then the 991 in the twisties. They can be had all day for mid 70's brand new with all the sport options. I would highly recommend driving one but make sure you drive a manual the pdk makes the cayman feel slow.
__________________
Last edited by ridin135; 06-25-2014 at 12:35 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 12:31 PM | #91 |
Moderator
618
Rep 10,855
Posts |
P-cars -- more fun to drive, more attention getting
M3 -- way more practical with room, comfortable DD and highway cruiser. Nearly equivalent performance and cost to own.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 12:46 PM | #92 |
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep 230
Posts |
I don't buy used cars, so that's out.
No interest in a base 911, I would just get a Boxster/Cayman GTS. The 991S is very nice, but imho overpriced. 911s are not that uncommon in my area, I have seen 3 991 Turbos (one convertible) in the last week. So going with the M4. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 01:40 PM | #93 | |
First Lieutenant
64
Rep 386
Posts |
Quote:
Also, the new M3/4 is lighter in weight and only slightly increased in base price (with more standard equipment), so I'm not sure why you think it's overweight and overpriced and yet you were "with" the e9x M3. Hey you're certainly entitled to buy whatever the hell you want but I'm not sure what you're getting at with these seemingly nonsensical statements about the M4. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 03:15 PM | #94 | |
First Lieutenant
19
Rep 311
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 03:30 PM | #95 | |
Banned
43
Rep 1,147
Posts |
Quote:
It's not that serious. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2014, 03:38 PM | #96 | |
Lieutenant
148
Rep 598
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 12:20 AM | #97 | |
New Member
3
Rep 12
Posts |
Quote:
You know, Lots of folks on this forum appear to say that they would never ever take a 911 base, but claim the 911s is the best thing since sliced bread. Strange, and is mostly Porsche marketing at its best. Yes, the 911s has more torque and 50 horses more, but depending on how you spec out the 911 (PASM, sport-chrono, PSE) , the difference is really minimal. Look at Dag Johnsen in his 3.4 when he races against a 911s on youtube and you'll see what I mean. There are folks out there that claim the base 991 provides the purest 911 experience. The way you should drive the 991 3.4 is very similar to how you should drive the e92 m3 - keep it above 4-5K. The 3.4 engine then really performs amazingly. I don't think there are any wrong choices here. The M3/M4 are amazing, its just not a 911. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 02:19 AM | #98 | |
Private First Class
8
Rep 199
Posts |
Quote:
The base 991 is a great car, I personally loved it. It's fast, sounds great, and almost looks as good as the s version that costs 10k more. I personally would never go with the base model for the simple fact that I know the s is that much better and seeing it in the streets would drive me crazy. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-26-2014, 02:26 AM | #99 |
Captain
274
Rep 651
Posts |
I posted this in an other thread but i think it maches the topic so i paste it in here as well.
Here is my take on the M4/M3 competitors. Some people seems to forget that M3/M4 is based on BMW AG's regular 3 and 4 series which in turn is basically the same cars underneath. The BMW M then make some modifications to the standard chassis and develops some new parts and tune them for the cars to make them more sporty ect ,the same is done at for example Audi RS and Mercedes AMG. This ensures if not to heavily modified that the standard versatility is still intact and i guess this is why so many people like these type of cars. So i think the competitors for the M3/M4 is Audi RS5/RS4, Mercedes C63 AMG sedan/coupe, Lexus RCF/IS F, Cadillac ATS-V and maybe some future Jaguar based on the coming XE model. I dont think the for example Porsche 911 or Corvette C7 is M3/M4 competitors those cars are dedicated bespoke sportcars built from the ground up to be sportcars. Look for example at the Corvette C7 bespoke aluminium chassis thats a long way from regular 3/4 series chassis. When building a dedicated sportcar mostly it results in a faster car than one based on a regular family car. But of course there are drawbacks when you built a dedicated sportcar you lose some of that versatility and comfort,interior space,luggage space, number of seats, to low ground clearance ect often a standard based car can bring all days all year round. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2014, 11:33 AM | #100 |
Lieutenant
65
Rep 520
Posts |
Get a year old 911 S and your price will comparable at top m3/m4. I looked at a 2012 911 S with 6k miles for 84k Msrp was 127k. Spend a little more and that Msrp can be 130-140 (all the options you would want.) Good luck.
__________________
2017 R8 V10 Plus, 2016 Boxster GTS, 2015 Macan S, 2015 V12 Vantage S - Pending Sale, 2013 911 C4S - Sold, 2012 V8 Vantage S - Sold, 2013 DB9 - Sold, 2011 997.2 Targa 4s - Sold, 2011 E90 335i M-Sport - Sold, 2013 981 Boxster S - Sold, 2006 E46 M3 - Sold, 2010 E60 M5 - Sold, 2006 E46 M3 - Sold, 2011.5 E90 M3 - Sold, 2006 325i - Sold, 2004 Mazda6 - Sold
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2014, 12:31 PM | #101 |
.
1232
Rep 1,918
Posts
Drives: 22 M8C Coupe, 21 X5MC
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Atlanta
|
Get the Cayman S/GTS. I love mine. Mine was about $86K.
__________________
Previous
21 X5M MBB, 20 Evora GT, 20 C63S Coupe,19 X5 50i, 18 Giulia QV, 18 M5, 17 Evora 400, 18 LX570, 17 GT350,18 M4 Comp,17 R8 V10 ,17 M3 Comp,17 GT350,16 Escalade Plat ESV, 16 570S,16 911 GTS,15 M5, 15 LX570, 13 M5,13 Viper,14 Cayman S,13 M3,13 S4,10 RX8,12 A4,10 G37, 04 Mini Cooper S, 08 Scion TC, 06 Altima V6, 05 Altima, 01 Altima, 00 Altima, 94 Explorer, 92 Toyota Pickup, 98 Altima |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2014, 02:35 PM | #102 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1759
Rep 1,668
Posts |
Quote:
No doubt fast en great build quality, but not what I`m looking for. I want small, nimble, agile.....and that is why I have, after owning a E46 M3, E92 M3 and now E82 1M, bought a Cayman GTS.... Keeping the 1M though, so a 4 seater 6 IL TT and a 2 seater 6 flat NA....... I love it when a plan comes together Next BMW stop; M2 Last edited by Romo; 07-03-2014 at 02:43 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|