|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Rear Camber too negative following Rear Axle Restoration
|
|
05-10-2024, 06:54 AM | #1 |
New Member
0
Rep 5
Posts |
Rear Camber too negative following Rear Axle Restoration
Hi all,
I have an '05 E91 330i automatic and have the following issue. Last year, I swapped out rear springs (Eibach Pro Kit), shocks (Bilstein B6) as well as rear control arms (M3). Afterwards I got an alignment and everything was fine. Over the last few weeks I put in - new rear subframe (aftermarket part with new bushings etc) due to rust on the original one - new wheel bearings + wheel hubs - new alignment bolts and nuts - new wheel carrier on the rear right as one of the threads was destroyed - I did the bushings etc on both wheel carriers of course - new track control arms (lemförder) - new CV shafts (Spidan from a manual since I got them from my friend - specs are identical in terms of length, they are just a bit thicker so they should affect anything) Went and got an alignment afterwards and the guy told me that can't get the rear camber any less negativ than -2.45 (left) and -2.31 (right) - bolts are already "maxed out" Two questions: - how bad is this? - which parts should I check in terms correct installation that could cause this? Car overall drives well - no noises etc. Thanks in advance! Last edited by alexandros89; 05-10-2024 at 07:12 AM.. |
05-11-2024, 01:54 AM | #4 |
Lieutenant
317
Rep 564
Posts |
not really, u need the printout before all the work to compare. ur probably only .5 off as lowered e9x lose camber adj depend on height and imo i would take a little front toe out (min toe spec or just under)
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-11-2024, 02:20 AM | #5 |
Brigadier General
3072
Rep 3,925
Posts |
The only thing that can cause this are the 4 control arms (not toe) each side, the subframe, and the wheel carriers. Of those, I'd say it's most likely either the subframe is out of spec, or you've somehow got the upper arms the wrong way around or something? At least the adjusters are in the correct place for what the alignment guy says is happening.
Anyhow -2.5 isn't terrible, but it will cause inner edge wear. My concern would be why this issue exists, not really the severity of the issue. |
Appreciate
1
Will_460cs213.50 |
05-11-2024, 07:07 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant
214
Rep 464
Posts |
m-sport spec is 1.8 degrees negative for rears.
I would say the the subframe is the culprit. The only other option is upper central control arm - but both would have to be shorter than factory. The "aftermarket subframes" are from asia, probably china and I doubt they are made as well as oem. If you have the old subframe measure from lower camber arm bolt locations from the bolt centre to the bolt centre and compare. |
Appreciate
1
Tambohamilton3071.50 |
Bookmarks |
|
|