View Single Post
      05-30-2010, 02:54 PM   #11
inTgr8r
Lieutenant General
inTgr8r's Avatar
Canada
2432
Rep
11,667
Posts

Drives: M2 Comp
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (10)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dekaliber View Post
................

Then again, BMW engineers could have opted for a higher ratio rear differential, lighter wheels, and better tires to improve performance to Cayman S levels without adding much to the cost of the vehicle. So, I guess it's also possible that they simply didn't commit the time or resources to really developing out this car to everything it could have been. Then again, the S54 powerplant isn't exactly new, and it was tuned to a higher power output in the M3 CSL.


And definitely, if I were going the tuning route, there's absolutely no reason you'd go with this shady CL company over something tried and true like ESS.
I think that is a big part of it.
The M variant was basically built from the parts bin.

Also, with it being a low volume unit, it wouldn't have had the R&D budget of other cars.
__________________
'21 M2C Hockenheim Silver
'18 718 Cayman S Lava Orange (sold)
'13 E92 M3 Santorini Blue (sold)
'07 Z4 M Coupe Alpine White (sold)
Appreciate 0