View Single Post
      10-26-2020, 08:18 PM   #56
BayMoWe335
Colonel
1173
Rep
2,132
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 335i 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: US

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitekidM2C View Post
But we're not on lock down. That's the point. Only certain areas are and that's because they have larger population densities. Like San Francisco. I think that the covid spread can be logically linked to population density like most viruses. The more contact the more spread, generally. Disney is a tough nut to crack because it's more important to contain the spread than to have people visit Mickey Mouse. But there's a lot of people out of work so they are working on a solution, but that takes a while due to red tape. With respect to housing it's a demand and supply thing. So from that perspective it is not a problem unless you HAVE to live here and cannot afford it. Just like a Hermes bag is a problem. You want it but cannot afford it. There's definitely options for cheaper housing, but you have to go out of the pricey areas. If you do, you'll find cheaper condos, etc.
Disney is a largely outdoor venue with parks all over the world re-opened. California is being difficult and ridiculous. The spread doesn't stop by closing Disney, because with that logic, you'd had to keep it closed until everyone is vaccinated. You need a plan to manage it, which Disney has implemented successfully elsewhere in states with reasonable governors.

There are lots of densely populated cities that are open...no one has "great" numbers, but we are managing. Everyone wants to focus on "CASES, CASES" but if you stop and think, are we any worse off than March? We are testing FAR more than ever and we are largely re-opened. Of course cases will be higher. Literally 99% of those will recover at home watching Netflix and ordering Doordash. The deaths will be a result of a multitude of factors (94% with an average of 2.6 accompanying factors) and 60% will be over 75 years old, 40% over 85. There will be some heart-wrenching sad cases sprinkled in, but we don't stop flying because planes crash. Add in the secondary factors for mandatory lockdowns and you realize this is completely illogical.

The original idea was to keep hospitals from being overwhelmed and supplying medical equipment. We've managed both those risks. Deaths have slowed. Cases are largely irrelevant. We need to watch hospitals and continue to manage those numbers. Most hospitals are completely fine.
Appreciate 6
sirdaft12193.50
Kooch102.00
jmack548.50